Summary: Kering

  • On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
  • From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
  • The company's MSCI ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.

Highlights: Kering

  • Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
  • Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.

Weaknesses: Kering

  • According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
  • The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
  • The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
  • With a 2025 P/E ratio at 31.47 times the estimated earnings, the company operates at rather significant levels of earnings multiples.
  • For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
  • The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
  • For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
  • For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
  • The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
  • Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
  • Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
  • The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.

Ratings Chart: Kering

Source: Surperformance

ESG chart: Kering

Source: MSCI

Fundamentals (Composite) Global Valuation (Composite) Financial estimates revisions (Composite) Capi.($)
28.49B
158B
90.57B
42.9B
22.77B
20.44B
19.21B
15.56B
9.34B
8.52B
Average 41.59B
Weighted average by Cap.
See all sector ratings
Investor (Composite)
Trader (Composite)
ESG MSCI
AAA

Financials

Revenue growth
EPS growth
Capital Efficiency (Composite)
Net Margin
Financial Health (Composite)

Valuation

P/E
EV/Revenue
EV/EBITDA
PBR
Dividend Yield

Revisions

Revenue revisions (1 year)
Revenue revisions (4 months)
Revenue revisions (1 month)
EPS revisions (1 year)
EPS revisions (4 months)

Consensus

Analysts' buy/sell recommendations
Analysts' recommendations evolution (4 months)
Analysts' target price
Analysts' target price evolution (4 months)
Analysts' target price evolution (1 year)

Business Predictability

Surprise rates
Analysts' coverage
Analysts' recommendations divergence
Analysts' Target price divergence
Financial estimates divergence

ESG

Environment
Social
Governance
Controversy
Ethical controversies
Human rights controversies
Tax subsidies controversies
Sharia compliant

Technical analysis

ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes