Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
153.1 GBX | +9.99% | +13.07% | -16.25% |
04-17 | BofA cuts Ashmore; JPMorgan lifts Fresnillo | AN |
04-16 | RBC raises Admiral; Barclays cuts Phoenix Group | AN |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- Analysts expect a sharply increasing business volume for the group, with high growth rates in the coming years.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
Weaknesses
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 4.23 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Renewable Energy Equipment & Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-16.25% | 368M | C+ | ||
-46.44% | 1.65B | C- | ||
-2.85% | 1.27B | - | - | |
-22.46% | 856M | - | ||
-27.90% | 774M | C+ | ||
-5.12% | 343M | C- | ||
-9.27% | 173M | D+ | ||
-19.82% | 69.32M | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- CWR Stock
- Ratings Ceres Power Holdings plc