ATIONS
FORGENE
GENERATIONS
FORGENERATIO
EU Taxonomy Report 2023
2 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Content
1. | Introduction | 3 |
2. | Results and Initiatives in 2023 | 3 |
3. | Scope | 5 |
4. | Process | 6 |
5. | Assessments | 28 |
6. | Minimum Social Safeguards | 28 |
7. | Accounting Policies and Contextual | |
Information About the KPIs | 29 | |
8. | Future Work | 32 |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 3 |
1. Introduction
The EU Taxonomy aims to scale up sustainable investments and avoid greenwash- ing by defining a common language and understanding of sustainable activities. As part of the European Union's Green Deal, the EU Taxonomy is a classification system for sustainable economic activities, consisting of the following six environmental objectives:
- Climate change mitigation
- Climate change adaptation
- The sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
- The transition to a circular economy
- Pollution prevention and control
- The protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
Environmental objectives 3-6 were adopted in the EU in June 2023, through the Commission Delegated Regulations of June 2023, (EU) 2023/2486 and (EU) 2023/2485. In addition, amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 for the environmental objectives 1 and 2 were also adopted as of June 2023. Due to delays in the legislative process in the European Economic Area, the June 2023 regulations did not enter into force in Norway in 2023. The Norwegian Ministry of Finance has communicated that Norwegian undertakings are encouraged, but not required, to report on the environmental objectives 3-6 for the financial year of 2023. Only climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation following Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are required for the 2023 reporting in Norway. However, considering the implementation in the EU and the encouragement from the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, AFK has chosen to include environmental objectives 3-6, in accordance with the Commission Delegated Regulations of June 2023. AFK reports on eligibility and alignment for environmental objectives 1 and 2 following Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and on eligibility for economic activities adopted by the EU as of June 2023. Additionally, one of AFK's portfolio companies have chosen to report alignment on one of their activities contributing to water and marine resources.
2. Results and Initiatives in 2023
We are proud to report on all six environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy. Arendals Fossekompani's portfolio contribute to multiple environmental objectives, covering climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and water and marine resources. Further, we recognize that one of AFK's main contributions going forward may be through enabling others in the transition, through activities that have potential to be enabling.
Throughout 2023, AFK has developed its reporting on the EU Taxonomy in line with the developments and new guidance from the European Commission regarding the EU Taxonomy Regulation. This has also led to strengthened understanding of the EU Taxonomy's definitions of the KPIs.
This year's reporting show stable developments of the KPIs compared to last year. Aligned turnover is largely consistent, with a small increase of 0.3%. Eligible, not aligned turnover has seen an increase of roughly 1.3%. Aligned, and eligible, not aligned CapEx have seen an increase of 12.9% and 1%, respectively. We are pleased to observe that the capital expenditures across AFKs portfolio are yielding tangible results that are reflected in the EU Taxonomy score. Both aligned, and eligible, not aligned OpEx see decreases compared to the voluntary reporting in 2022. These changes highlight the improvements made to the calculation methodology in the
4 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
2023 report, driven by a strengthened understanding of the EU Taxonomy's OpEx definition. For further explanation of the KPIs and the relevant accounting policies, see chapter 7.
The high percentage of eligible activities reflects the great potential in our portfolio companies. Our goal is to further increase both eligible and aligned reporting in the years to come.
EU TAXONOMY ELIGIBILITY AND ALIGNMENT
Turnover1 | CapEx2 | OpEx3 | |||||||||
Aligned | 22.3% | Aligned | 16.6% | Aligned | 6.9% | ||||||
Eligible, not aligned | 37.6% | Eligible, not aligned | 46.3% | Eligible, not aligned | 10.4% | ||||||
Non-eligible | 40.1% | Non-eligible | 37.0% | Non-eligible | 82.7% | ||||||
1. Within the aligned turnover | 2. Within the aligned CapEx | 3. Within the aligned OpEx |
and the eligible, not aligned | and the eligible, not aligned | and the eligible, not aligned |
turnover, 3.7% and 12.1% | CapEx, 4.7% and 2,7% | OpEx, 1.9% and 1.7% |
respectively are related to | respectively are related to | respectively are related to |
the Commission Delegated | the Commission Delegated | the Commission Delegated |
Regulations of June 2023. | Regulations of June 2023. | Regulations of June 2023. |
AFK's portfolio companies' show great diversity, with eligible activities within a specter of sectors and environmental objectives. Summarized, the portfolio companies' eligible and aligned economic activities can be listed as follows:
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 5 |
ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE PORTFOLIO
Environmental | Economic activity as defined | Transitional/ | Aligned/eligible, | Relevant | |
objective | in the EU Taxonomy | enabling | not aligned | companies | |
Climate | 4.9 | Transmission and | Enabling | Aligned | Volue |
change | distribution of electricity | ||||
mitigation | 4.5 | Electricity generation | Aligned | AFK Vannkraft | |
from hydropower | |||||
3.6 | Manufacture of other | Enabling | Aligned | TEKNA | |
low carbon technologies | |||||
3.6 | Manufacture of other | * | Eligible, | ENRX, | |
low carbon technologies | not aligned | TEKNA | |||
7.1 | Construction of new buildings | Eligible, | AFK Property, | ||
not aligned | Ampwell, ENRX | ||||
7.7 | Acquisition and | Eligible, | AFK Property, | ||
ownership of buildings | not aligned | Volue, ENRX | |||
8.2 | Data-driven solutions | * | Eligible, | Volue, | |
for GHG emissions reductions | not aligned | Alytic | |||
6.15 | Infrastructure enabling low-carbon | * | Eligible, | ENRX | |
road transport and public transport | not aligned | ||||
3.4 | Manufacture of batteries | * | Eligible, | Ampwell | |
not aligned | |||||
4.10 | Storage of electricity | * | Eligible, | Ampwell | |
not aligned | |||||
8.1 | Data processing, hosting | ** | Eligible, | Ampwell | |
and related activities | not aligned | ||||
7.2 | Renovation of existing buildings | ** | Eligible, | AFK Vannkraft | |
not aligned | |||||
Climate | 7.2 | Renovation of existing buildings | Aligned | AFK Vannkraft | |
change | 8.2 | Computer programming, | Eligible, | Volue | |
adaptation | |||||
consultancy and related activities | not aligned | ||||
9.1 | Close to market research, | * | Eligible, | Alytic | |
development and innovation | not aligned | ||||
14.1 | Emergency services | * | Eligible, | NSSLGlobal | |
not aligned | |||||
7.1 | Construction of new buildings | Eligible, | AFK Property | ||
not aligned | |||||
4.5 | Electricity generation from hydropower | Eligible, | AFK Vannkraft | ||
not aligned | |||||
Transition | 3.1 | Construction of new buildings | Eligible, | AFK Property, | |
to a circular | not aligned | Ampwell, ENRX | |||
economy | 5.5 | Product-as-a-service and other circular use- | Eligible, | NSSLGlobal | |
and result-oriented service models | not aligned | ||||
5.2 Sale of spare parts | Eligible, | ENRX | |||
not aligned | |||||
4.1 | Provision of IT/OT | * | Eligible, | Volue | |
data-driven solutions | not aligned | ||||
3.2 | Renovation of existing buildings | Eligible, | AFK Vannkraft | ||
not aligned | |||||
Sustainable use | 4.1 | Provision of IT/OT data-driven | Enabling | Aligned | Volue |
and protection of | solutions for leakage reduction | ||||
water and marine | |||||
resources |
- Activities that have the potential to be enabling, however are not
lassified as such since the technical screening criteria are not considered met. - Activities that have the potential to be transitional, however are not
classified as such since the technical screening criteria are not considered met.
6 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
3. Scope
All portfolio companies in the AFK group have been included in the reporting on the EU Taxonomy for 2023. We have not included joint ventures and associated compa- nies, as they are not consolidated in the group's financial statements. Each portfolio company has identified their business activities and assessed each activity with regards to the EU Taxonomy economic activities within the scope of all six environmental objectives.
4. Process
The EU Taxonomy assessment has been conducted by each portfolio company, supported by a core team with representatives from AFK. Assessments have been performed in accordance with the structure of the EU Taxonomy, starting with eligibility assessments before assessing compliance with the criteria for substantial contribution and do no significant harm ("DNSH").The minimum safeguards assessment has been conducted by AFK on group level, based on policies and procedures covering the AFK group. Eligible activities that meet the criteria for substantial contribution and DNSH, as well as the minimum safeguards, are reported as aligned. AFK reports the EU Taxonomy on an aggregate of portfolio companies. To ensure consistency in reporting and assessments of eligibility and alignment across the portfolio, the core AFK team has put in place reporting routines and guidelines for assessments.
In 2023 we performed a re-evaluation of the eligible activities from the 2022 report- ing. Considering new acquisitions, activities for the four remaining environmental objectives adopted by the EU and FAQs published by the European Commission. Eligibility was assessed considering the portfolio companies' business activities against the economic activities defined in the EU Taxonomy. Relevant NACE-codes and activity descriptions for each economic activity were identified and examined. Vergia does not have any eligible economic activities since all activities and investments are through joint ventures and associated companies, and as such accounted for through the equity method.
The alignment process consists of assessing the criteria for substantial contribution and do no significant harm, as well as minimum safeguards. When assessing the technical screening criteria, we have experienced challenges within interpretations and best practice. Some of the criteria refer to EU-directives, that may not be, or is only partially adopted and implemented in Norway. Subsequently this may lead to requirements and thresholds not being provided.
5. Assessments
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ABBREVIATION | DEFINITION |
CCM | Climate change mitigation |
CCA | Climate change adaptation |
W&M | Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources |
CE | The transition to a circular economy |
PP | Pollution prevention and control regarding use and presence of chemicals |
B&E | Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems |
DNSH | Do no significant harm |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 7 |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
4.5 | Eligibility | AFK Hydropower operates the hydropower plants at Bøylefoss | Aligned |
Electricity | and Flatenfoss, generating electricity from hydropower | ||
generation from | |||
Substantial | Both plants are run-of-river plants and do not have artificial res- | ||
hydropower | |||
contribution | ervoirs. As such, both hydropower plants meet the substantial | ||
(CCM) | |||
contribution criteria listed in letter a). | |||
DNSH | CCA: Climate risk assessment has been conducted in accor- | ||
dance with Appendix A. The assessment is based on a TCFD | |||
analysis conducted in 2021, performed at company level, which | |||
has been further developed in 2023 by analysing the physical | |||
risks listed in appendix A at economic activity level. Adaptation | |||
solutions for the identified physical climate risks are considered | |||
and implemented as part of the concession. | |||
W&M: The Water Framework Directive is implemented through | |||
the Norwegian 'Vannforskriften', which both hydropower plants | |||
are required to comply with. The directive follows European | |||
standards for water management. Additionally, both plants | |||
have fish friendly turbines. As such, the criteria related to mit- | |||
igation measures for impacts on water and species directly | |||
dependent of water are considered met. | |||
B&E: Environmental impact assessments are carried out on | |||
an annual basis for both plants in relation to concession and | |||
permit. Mitigation measures are implemented within the time | |||
constraints of the concession/permit. None of the plants are in | |||
or near biodiversity-sensitive areas. However, measures have | |||
been taken to accommodate eels, should it return to the water- | |||
ways. Measures are also in place to support salmon spawning | |||
downstream at Bøylefoss. As such, the criteria listed in appen- | |||
dix D are considered met. | |||
4.5 | Eligibility | See description of the activity in activity 4.5 contributing to | Eligible, |
Electricity | CCM above. Additionally, a climate risk assessment is con- | not aligned | |
generation from | ducted in line with Appendix A, and an expenditure plan has | ||
hydropower | been set up to implement adaptation solutions to reduce the | ||
(CCA) | activity's most significant physical climate risks. | ||
Substantial | A climate risk assessment has been conducted in accordance | ||
contribution | with criteria, based on a TCFD analysis conducted in 2021, per- | ||
formed at company level. This was further developed in 2023 | |||
by analysing the physical risks listed in Appendix A at economic | |||
activity level. Adaptation solutions for the identified physical | |||
climate risks are considered and implemented as part of the | |||
concession. | |||
The identified solutions are consistent with the applicable local, | |||
sectoral, and national adaptation plans and strategies, and a | |||
plan for implementation of the identified adaptation solutions | |||
is in place. As of 2023, these measures have yet to be imple- | |||
mented to full extent. As such, the economic activity is not con- | |||
sidered compliant with the criteria for substantial contribution | |||
to climate change adaptation. |
8 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
DNSH | The economic activity fulfils the DNSH criteria, however the | ||
activity will not be reported as aligned against the climate | |||
change adaptation objective since the substantial contribution | |||
criteria is not met. For reference, the DNSH criteria are identi- | |||
cal to those accounted for above in relation to climate change | |||
mitigation, except for the DNSH to CCM. The DNSH to CCM is | |||
considered met as the direct GHG of the electricity generation | |||
activity is lower than 270gCO2e/kWh. | |||
7.2 | Eligibility | AFK Hydropower are conducting façade rehabilitation at the Aligned | |
Renovation | Bøylefoss power plant.A climate risk assessment has also been | ||
of existing | carried out an the rehabilitation is considered eligible. | ||
buildings | |||
Substantial | The façade rehabilitation has implemented physical and | ||
(CCA) | |||
contribution | non-physical adaptation solutions that substantially reduce the | ||
most important physical climate risks material to the activity. | |||
The material climate risks are identified based on the list set | |||
out in Appendix A. For the screening of physical climate risks, | |||
three climate scenarios have been used: RCP 1.2 & IEA Net Zero, | |||
RCP 4.5 and RCP 6.0As such, the economic activity fulfills the | |||
substantial contribution criteria. For this assessment, the risks | |||
have been assessed based on three time-horizons defined by | |||
CSRD: Short-term (less than 1 year), medium-term(1-5 years) | |||
and long-term (more than 5 years). As such, the economic | |||
activity is considered aligned with the criteria for substantial | |||
contribution. | |||
DNSH | CCM: The building is not dedicated to extraction, storage, | ||
transport or manufacture of fossil fuels. | |||
W&M: Not applicable, as there are no water appliances are | |||
installed. | |||
CE: The renovation follows standards and instructions set by a | |||
leading Nordic provider of circular solutions and waste manage- | |||
ment. The standards are in accordance with EU Construction | |||
and Demolition Waste Management Protocol and ensure that | |||
minimum 70% of the non-hazardous construction and demo- | |||
lition waste is prepared for reuse, recycling, or other material | |||
recovery. The renovation utilizes as much as possible of the | |||
original components and does only use recycled concrete. | |||
PP: All building components and materials used in the con- | |||
struction comply with the criteria set out in Appendix C. The | |||
majority of the products used are chalk, mortar, and mineral | |||
silicate paint. None of these or other products or instances | |||
used are in violation with EU REACH. All possible measures | |||
have been taken to reduce noise, dust, and pollutant emissions | |||
during the construction works. | |||
As such, the economic activity is considered aligned with the | |||
criteria for do no significant harm. |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 9 |
7.2 | Eligibility | See eligibility description from activity 7.2 contributing to CCA | Eligible, |
Renovation | assessment | above. | not aligned |
of existing | |||
buildings | Substantial | The renovation work complies with the definition for'major ren- | |
(CCM) | contribution | ovations' of buildings from Directive 2010/31/EU, as more than | |
25% of the surface of the building envelope underwent reno- | |||
vation in 2023. The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive | |||
(EPBD, 2010/31/EU) is not implemented in Norwegian law | |||
and the specific cost-optimal minimum energy performance | |||
requirements are therefore not known. Since the building is | |||
a cultural heritage and protected, there are restrictions on | |||
which measures AFK Hydropower can implement, affecting the | |||
potential for increasing the energy performance. Due to these | |||
limitations, AFK Hydropower have not assessed the renovation | |||
as compliant with the substantial contribution requirement. | |||
DNSH | The façade rehabilitation fulfills the DNSH criteria. However, | ||
the economic activity does not comply with the substantial | |||
contribution criteria and is therefore not reported as aligned. | |||
3.2 | Eligibility | See eligibility description from activity 7.2 contributing to CCA | Eligible, |
Renovation | above. | not aligned | |
of existing | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
buildings | |||
contribution | ing on alignment is not a requirement for the environmental | ||
(CE) | |||
and DNSH | objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section 1 | ||
Introduction. |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
7.1 | Eligibility | AFK Property is involved in the development of the residential | Eligible, |
Construction | building project Bryggebyen on own account, by bringing the | not aligned | |
of new buildings | financial means to realise the project for later sale and exe- | ||
(CCM) | cuting the work on a contract basis. Further, AFK Property is | ||
involved in the development of an annex to an existing com- | |||
mercial building at Bølevegen 4, financing the project on own | |||
account and operating on a contract basis. | |||
Substantial | The calculated Primary Energy Demand (PED) of the build- | ||
contribution | ings are not 10% lower than the defined threshold for nearly | ||
zero-energy building (NZEB) requirements, and the substantial | |||
contribution criteria is not considered met. Additional require- | |||
ments related to air-tightness and thermal integrity are not | |||
applicable as none of the buildings exceed 5000 m2. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. |
10 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI | EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 11 |
7.1 | Eligibility | See description of the activity "Bryggebyen" related to activity | Eligible, |
Construction | 7.1 regarding CCM above. As required by the Taxonomy, a cli- | not aligned | |
of new buildings | mate risk assessment has been carried out and an expenditure | ||
(CCA) | plan for adaptation solutions is implemented for Bryggebyen, | ||
in accordance with Appendix A. As a result, Bryggebyen is con- | |||
sidered eligible under climate change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | The economic activity is currently not considered aligned with | ||
contribution | all the technical screening criteria for substantial contribution | ||
to CCA. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. | |||
7.1 | Eligibility | See description of the activity "Bølevegen" related to activity 7.1 | Not |
Construction | regarding CCM above.The climate risk assessment and expen- | eligible | |
of new buildings | diture plan for Bølevegen complies with regional requirements | ||
(CCA) | but fell short of meeting the requirements of Appendix A. As | ||
a result, Bølevegen is not considered eligible under climate | |||
change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. | |||
3.1 | Eligibility | See eligibility description from activity 7.1 regarding CCM | Eligible, |
Construction | above. | not aligned | |
of new buildings | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
(CE) | |||
contribution | ing on alignment and is not a requirement for the environmen- | ||
and DNSH | tal objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section | ||
1 Introduction. | |||
7.7 | Eligibility | AFK Property owns several properties and exercises own- | Eligible, |
Acquisition | ership of these real estates. This goes for the properties at | not aligned | |
and ownership | Steinodden, Bedriftsveien 17, Gullknapp, Bølevegen 4, and | ||
of buildings | Bryggebyen Vindholmen. | ||
(CCM) | |||
Substantial | None of the buildings have an Energy Performance Certificate | ||
contribution | (EPC) class A, nor are any of them within the 15% of the national | ||
or regional building stock expressed as operational Primary | |||
Energy Demand (PED) and the substantial contribution criteria | |||
is not considered met. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. |
7.7 | Eligibility | See description of the activities related to Steinodden, | Not |
Acquisition | Bedriftsveien 17, Gullknapp, Bølevegen 4 and Bryggebyen | eligible | |
and ownership | Vindholmen for economic activity 7.7 regarding CCM above. | ||
of buildings | The climate risk assessment and expenditure plan for the | ||
(CCA) | properties does not meet the requirements of Appendix A. As | ||
a result, none of these buildings are considered eligible under | |||
climate change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. |
12 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
9.2 | Eligibility | Edge by Kontali provides a collection of seafood data, giving | Eligible, |
Close to | access to world-leading data insight with millions of data | not aligned | |
market research, | points 24/7. The platform offers expertise on a large variety of | ||
development | seafood species and industries, closely follow the value chains | ||
and innovation | end to end. Covering global trends, detailed in-depth analy- | ||
(CCA) | ses and research. Kontali delivers reports to decision makers | ||
worldwide, both in private and public sectors. | |||
Substantial | Due to uncertainties regarding the technical screening criteria, | ||
contribution | the platform is considered not aligned. This specifically related | ||
to the adaptation criteria and the use of best available science. | |||
Do no | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
significant | stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | ||
harm | teria has not yet been carried out. | ||
9.1 | Eligibility | The Edge platform is not considered eligible for economic | Not |
Close to | activity 9.1 contributing to Climate Change Mitigation, as it is | eligible | |
market research, | not dedicated to reduction, avoidance or removal of GHG emis- | ||
development | sions. | ||
and innovation | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
(CCM) | |||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Mitigation, no further | ||
and DNSH | assessment of technical screening criteria has been carried | ||
out. | |||
8.2 Data-driven | Eligibility | Veyt is the global insight business for all significant low carbon | Eligible, |
solutions for | markets and renewable energy. Veyt's platform offers inde- | not aligned | |
GHG emissions | pendent and neutral market intelligence, covering green cer- | ||
reductions | tificates for power and gas and carbon markets. The aim is to | ||
(CCM) | simplify these complex markets to make informed decisions | ||
and positively contribute to the global net-zero transformation, | |||
supporting firms by providing price benchmarking, insights | |||
and analytics. As such, the activity is predominantly aimed | |||
at the provision of data and analytics enabling GHG emission | |||
reductions. | |||
Substantial | Veyt's solution substantial contributes to GHG emission reduc- | ||
contribution | tions by enabling the energy market to efficient source renew- | ||
able energy as the only source of their energy consumption. | |||
The documentation requirement regarding life-cycle GHG | |||
emissions calculation has not been fulfilled, hence the substan- | |||
tial contribution criteria is considered not met. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 13 |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
3.4 | Eligibility | Ampwell's subsidiary Commeo GmbH is engaged in the man- | Eligible, |
Manufacture | ufacturing of energy storage and management solutions, uti- | not aligned | |
of batteries | lizing lithium-ion battery technology with a focus on safety | ||
(CCM) | and modularity. The products cater to various industrial appli- | ||
cations, spanning from manufacturing to energy supply. This | |||
comprises the manufacture of rechargeable batteries, battery | |||
packs, accumulators, and associated components such as bat- | |||
tery cells, casings, and electronic components. | |||
Substantial | The economic activity manufactures rechargeable batteries, | ||
contribution | battery packs and accumulators, including from secondary raw | ||
materials, that result in substantial GHG emission reductions | |||
in transport, stationary and off-grid energy storage and other | |||
industrial applications. However, it does not recycle end-of-life | |||
batteries. As a result, the activity is not aligned with the sub- | |||
stantial contribution criteria. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. | |||
3.4 | Eligibility | See description of the activity in 3.4 related to CCM above. A | Not |
Manufacture | climate risk assessment and expenditure plan has not been | eligible | |
of batteries | conducted yet. As such, the activity is not considered eligible | ||
(CCA) | under climate change adaptation. | ||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. | |||
8.1 | Eligibility | Ampwell's subsidiary Cellect provides solutions for energy | Eligible, |
Data | storage in the renewable energy sector. The activity involves | not aligned | |
processing, | software for energy storage assets, hardware for on-site data | ||
hosting and | control and acquisition, and battery system integration with | ||
related activities | the Cellect cloud. | ||
(CCM) | |||
Substantial | The economic activity is currently not considered compliant | ||
contribution | with the technical screening criteria for substantial contribu- | ||
tion. This primarily relates to uncertainties regarding criteria | |||
related to data centers, as Cellect neither owns or operates | |||
data centers, but uses cloud hosting companies. Cellect will | |||
continue the assessment and further develop its understand- | |||
ing of the criteria going forward. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. |
14 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
7.1 | Eligibility | Ampwell's subsidiary Commeo Property GmbH is involved | Eligible, |
Construction | in the development of a battery factory in Germany on own | not aligned | |
of new buildings | account. | ||
(CCM) | |||
Substantial | The primary energy demand (PED) is 10% lower than the | ||
contribution | threshold for nearly-zero energy building (NZEB) require- | ||
ments in Germany, as outlined in the building's GEG certificate | |||
(German Building Energy Act). However, as a DGNB certifica- | |||
tion (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen) was not | |||
commissioned from the outset, the activity does not meet all | |||
the criteria for substantial contribution. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. | |||
3.1 | Eligibility | See eligibility description from activity 7.1 regarding CCM | Eligible, |
Construction | above. | not aligned | |
of new buildings | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
(CE) | |||
contribution | ing on alignment is not a requirement for the environmental | ||
objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section 1 | |||
Introduction. | |||
7.1 | Eligibility | See description for activity 7.1 related to Climate Change | Not |
Construction | Mitigation above. A climate risk assessment and expenditure | eligible | |
of new buildings | plan has not been conducted in accordance with the require- | ||
(CCA) | ments of the criteria . As such, the activity is not considered | ||
eligible under climate change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. | |||
4.10 | Eligibility | Ampwell GmbH has invested in a small battery storage facility, | Eligible, |
Storage of | contributing to both research and development of product and | not aligned | |
electricity | services and acting as a showcase for electric vehicle charging, | ||
(CCM) | specifically for trucks and HDVs. | ||
Substantial | In 2023, the activities carried out were related to research and | ||
contribution | development at the facility used as a show case. As such, there | ||
has not been any commercial activity for operation of electric- | |||
ity storage and the substantial contribution criteria related to | |||
the operation of electricity storage were not considered met. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. | |||
4.10 Storage of | Eligibility | See description related to the economic activity 4.10 for CCM | Not |
electricity (CCA) | above. A climate risk assessment and expenditure plan has not | eligible | |
been conducted in accordance with the requirements of the | |||
criteria . As such, the activity is not considered eligible under | |||
climate change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 15 |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
3.6 | Eligibility | Manufacturing of induction power generators for a wide range | Eligible, |
Manufactureof | of applications; brazing, welding, bonding and more. The activ- | not aligned | |
other low carbon | ity enables customers to lower own emissions in production | ||
technologies | processes and also enable manufacturing of low carbon tech- | ||
(CCM) | nologies. | ||
Substantial | The purpose of the applications is to strengthen the material | ||
contribution | structure, durability, and lifetime of metal components, all with | ||
high accuracy and repeatability, and replacing alternative tech- | |||
nologies with traditional methods such as manual work with | |||
flame and gas. As of today, the criteria are not yet fulfilled, as | |||
no documentation on the life-cycle GHG emissions savings are | |||
available at this point. However, the assumption is that induc- | |||
tion is the economically best solution for several applications | |||
available at the market. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the criteria for sub- | ||
stantial contribution, a complete assessment of the DNSH cri- | |||
teria has not yet been carried out. | |||
3.6 | Eligibility | See description of the activity related to activity 3.6 regarding | Not |
Manufacture of | CCM above.The activity enables customers to lower own emis- | eligible | |
other low carbon | sions in production processes and enable manufacturing of low | ||
technologies | carbon technologies. Yet, there is currently no documentation | ||
(CCA) | available to demonstrate ENRX's technology to have lower | ||
life-cycle GHG emissions compared to the best performing | |||
alternative in the industry. Hence, the activity is not considered | |||
eligible under the Climate Change Adaptation objective. | |||
Substantial | Since the economic activity is not considered eligible for the | ||
contribution | environmental objective Climate Change Adaptation, no fur- | ||
and DNSH | ther assessment of technical screening criteria has been car- | ||
ried out. | |||
6.15 | Eligibility | Manufacturing of wireless charging systems for electric-driven | Eligible, |
Infrastructure | busses, heavy-duty vehicles, and ferries for public transpor- | not aligned | |
enabling low- | tation. Wireless charging based on inductive power trans- | ||
carbon road | fer offers a higher utilization of the available charging time, | ||
transport and | increased safety, and unprecedented system reliability. ENRX's | ||
public transport | charging solutions may result in less maintenance and no | ||
(CCM) | cabling requirements. | ||
Substantial | The wireless charging systems for busses, heavy-duty indus- | ||
contribution | trial vehicles and public ferries are used as electric charging | ||
points for zero tailpipe emissions and are not dedicated to | |||
transport or storage of fossil fuels. The criteria for substantial | |||
contribution are therefore considered met. | |||
DNSH | Since the economic activity does not fulfill the DNSH criteria | ||
for all environmental objectives, a complete assessment of the | |||
DNSH criteria has not yet been carried out. |
16 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
5.2 | Eligibility | Sale of spare parts to support lifetime extensions of ENRX's | Eligible, |
Sale of spare | systems. In addition to refurbishing and upgrading existing | not aligned | |
parts (CE) | installations, spare parts are sold to exceed baseline up to 25 | ||
years. | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
contribution | ing on alignment is not a requirement for the environmental | ||
and DNSH | objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section 1 | ||
Introduction. | |||
7.1 | Eligibility | ENRX is involved in the development of an annex to the existing | Eligible, |
Construction | office building at Bølevegen 4, on own account. | not aligned | |
of new buildings | |||
Substantial | AFK Property is engaged in the construction. Refer to assess- | ||
(CCM) | |||
contribution | ment provided for activity 7.1 Construction of new buildings in | ||
and DNSH | the section for AFK Property. | ||
7.1 | Eligibility | See description of the activity 7.1 regarding CCM above. The | Eligible, |
Construction | climate risk assessment and expenditure plan for the annex at | not aligned | |
of new buildings | Bølevegen 4 does not meet the requirements of Appendix A. | ||
(CCA) | As a result, the activity is not considered eligible under climate | ||
change adaptation. | |||
Substantial | AFK Property is engaged in the construction. Refer to assess- | ||
contribution | ment provided for activity 7.1 Construction of new buildings in | ||
and DNSH | the section for AFK Property. | ||
3.1 | Eligibility | See activity description of activity 7.1 regarding CCM above. | Eligible, |
Construction | not aligned | ||
Substantial | AFK Property is engaged in the construction. Refer to assess- | ||
of new buildings | |||
contribution | ment provided for activity 7.1 Construction of new buildings in | ||
(CE) | |||
and DNSH | the section for AFK Property. | ||
7.7 | Eligibility | ENRX leases Bølevegen 4, consisting of offices, production | Eligible, |
Acquisition | facility and storage space. The property is formally owned by | not aligned | |
and ownership | AFK Property but is leased through a bare-house agreement | ||
of buildings | where ENRX is responsible for maintenance and repair and | ||
(CCM) | risks related to the building. ENRX is considered eligible as a | ||
right-of-use asset is recognized in the balance sheet in accor- | |||
dance with IFRS 16. | |||
Substantial | AFK Property have performed the alignment assessment as | ||
contribution | they are the legal owners of the property. Refer to assessment | ||
and DNSH | provided for activity 7.7 Acquisition and ownership of buildings | ||
in the section for AFK Property. | |||
7.7 | Eligibility | See activity description of activity 7.7 regarding CCM above.The | Not eligible |
Acquisition | climate risk assessment and expenditure plan for Bølevegen | ||
and ownership | complies with regional requirements but fell short of meeting | ||
of buildings | the requirements of Appendix A. As a result, Bølevegen is not | ||
(CCA) | considered eligible under climate change adaptation. | ||
Substantial | AFK Property have performed the alignment assessment as | ||
contribution | they are the legal owners of the property. Refer to assessment | ||
and DNSH | provided for activity 7.7 Acquisition and ownership of buildings | ||
in the section for AFK Property. |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 17 |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
14.1 | Eligibility | The communication system "Airtime" supports rapid mobile | Eligible, not |
Emergency | deployment in areas of natural disaster and conflict. The com- | assessed for | |
services | munication system is considered eligible as part of technical | alignment | |
(CCA) | protection response and assistance to a climate hazard by | ||
operating emergency communication system. | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as | ||
contribution | reporting on alignment is not a requirement for the activities | ||
and DNSH | added through the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) | ||
2023/2485, refer to section 1 Introduction | |||
5.5 | Eligibility | VSAT Leasing Orders is a take back program where equipment | Eligible, not |
Product-as-a- | is refurbished for resale, rental, or support stock. The revenue | assessed for | |
service and other | model is to a large degree based on multi-year subscription | alignment | |
circular use-and | contracts, providing customers with access to products and | ||
result-oriented | securing a significant degree of recurring revenues. | ||
service models | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
(CE) | |||
contribution | ing on alignment is not a requirement for the environmental | ||
and DNSH | objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section 1 | ||
Introduction. |
18 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Economic activity | Type of assessment | Interpretation and assessment | Conclusion |
4.1 | Eligibility | The software solution segment "Water and communities" pro- | Aligned |
Provision of | vides a complete overview of the water supply network and its | ||
IT/OT data- | condition, enabling municipalities and water companies to be | ||
driven solutions | data-driven and to control, manage and mitigate leakages in | ||
for leakage | the water supply systems. | ||
reduction | |||
Substantial | As a holistic water tool that gives the user a complete overview | ||
(W&M) | |||
contribution | of the water supply system and capabilities to control, manage, | ||
reduce and mitigate water leakages, "Water and communities" | |||
comply with the technical screening criteria: | |||
(a) Monitoring systems including holistic IT/OT suites/tools, or | |||
add-ons/extensions to such tools that provide identification, | |||
tracking and tracing water leakage | |||
(b) IT/OT solutions, or add-ons/extensions to such tools, that | |||
provide controlling, managing and mitigating water leakage | |||
In the risk analysis, it has been identified that the use of Volue's | |||
solution does not lead to any risks related to water quality or | |||
water stress. Nor does the use of Volue's software provide any | |||
risks that may prevent the operator of achieving good water | |||
status and good ecological potential. | |||
Do no | CCA: Climate risk assessment is performed in accordance with | ||
significant | appendix A. The assessment is based on a TCFD analysis con- | ||
harm | ducted in 2021, performed at company level, which has been | ||
further developed in 2023 by analysing the physical risks listed | |||
in appendix A at economic activity level. No material physical | |||
climate risks have been identified. | |||
TCE: The primary end-of-life waste is the computer hardware | |||
used in the development and management of the software. | |||
Volue has an agreement with an electronic recycling service | |||
provider, who works in accordance with EU WEEE Directive. | |||
P&C: The equipment used for "Water and Communities" meet | |||
the requirements set out in the Directive 2009/125/EC of the | |||
European Parliament and of the Council for servers and data | |||
storage products. No equipment used contain any of the | |||
restricted substances listed in Annex II to Directive 2011/65/EU. | |||
4.1 | Eligibility | The construction software "Gemini Terrain" is a design and | Eligible, |
Provision of | engineering software that supports eco-design of infrastruc- | not aligned | |
IT/OT data- | ture. The software is used for terrain calculations which can | ||
driven solutions | help the user limit the damage to nature and for mass calcula- | ||
(CE) | tions ensuring that the infrastructure is designed in an efficient | ||
way. Gemini Terrain is considered eligible through design and | |||
engineering software supporting the eco-design of products, | |||
equipment, and infrastructure, including waste management | |||
and resource efficiency. | |||
Substantial | The technical screening criteria are not considered as report- | ||
contribution | ing on alignment is not a requirement for the environmental | ||
and DNSH | objective Transition to a circular economy, refer to section 1 | ||
Introduction. |
EU TAXONOMY REPORT 2023 | 19 |
4.9 | Eligibility | Volue's Power Grid Software is used by electricity grid com- Aligned | |
Transmission | panies to design, maintain, analyze, and monitor their power | ||
and distribution | grid in real-time. The software solution includes grid documen- | ||
of electricity | tation and data management, grid planning & analytics, grid | ||
(CCM) | connection services and grid operation. Although Volue does | ||
not directly transmit or distribute electricity, the economic | |||
activities of Volue's Power Grid Software are listed in the sub- | |||
stantial contribution criteria, under "2. The activity is one of the | |||
following". As such, Power Grid Software is considered eligible. | |||
Substantial | Volue does not directly operate the transmission and distribu- | ||
contribution | tion infrastructure or equipment. However, all Volue's custom- | ||
ers' power grid is a part of the interconnected control areas of | |||
the Norwegian Power Grid. | |||
Volue delivers advanced software that increases the controlla- | |||
bility and observability of the electricity system and enables the | |||
integration of renewable energy sources in line with require- | |||
ment 2 (e) installation of equipment to increase the controlla- | |||
bility and observability of the electricity system and to enable | |||
the development and integration of renewable energy sources, | |||
where advanced software in this context is considered as | |||
equipment. | |||
DNSH | CCA: Climate risk assessment is performed in accordance with | ||
appendix A. The assessment is based on a TCFD analysis con- | |||
ducted in 2021, performed at company level, which has been | |||
further developed in 2023 by analysing the physical risks listed | |||
in appendix A at economic activity level. No material physical | |||
climate risks have been identified. | |||
TCE: Waste regarding Power Grid Software is electrical equip- | |||
ment used in the development.Volue has a waste management | |||
agreement with a third party, who ensures maximal reusage | |||
of all electrical waste. Volue's waste management plan is | |||
reflected in financial projections on a higher level and not for | |||
each product. | |||
PP: Considered not applicable as the activity do not include | |||
high voltage lines. | |||
B&E: Considered not applicable. Appendix D requires an | |||
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or screening in accor- | |||
dance with Directive 2011/92/EU. According to Article 2(4) in | |||
Directive 2011/92/EU, the EIA must only be conducted if the | |||
project is listed in Annex II of the Directive. As the activity is not | |||
listed in the Annex, an EIA has not been completed. |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Arendals Fossekompani ASA published this content on 12 April 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 12 April 2024 06:34:59 UTC.