CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
Basic Position on Corporate Governance
Based on its corporate philosophy, the Yamato Group | effectively utilizing the management resources of the |
carries out business activities in accordance with the law | Group is one of the top priorities of management, and we |
and social norms and actively promotes compliance man- | have implemented measures and bolstered management |
agement. Striving to maximize corporate value by | systems as part of our corporate governance initiative. |
Corporate Governance System (As of July 1, 2021)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Management Structure
Expertise and experience | |||||||||||
Nomination and | Human | Legal affairs | |||||||||
Compensation | Corporate | Marketing and | resources | Finance and | IT and digital | ||||||
Name | Position | Outside | and risk | Global | |||||||
Committee | management | sales | and labor | accounting | technologies | ||||||
management | |||||||||||
member | management | ||||||||||
Masaki Yamauchi | Chairperson of the | ||||||||||
Board of Directors | |||||||||||
Representative
Yutaka Nagao Director, Executive
Officer and President
Representative
Kenichi Shibasaki Director, Executive
Officer and Vice
President*
The Company is a Company with an Audit & Supervisory Board. In addition to important management decision- making and the supervision of business execution by the Board of Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board members and the Audit & Supervisory Board, which are independent from the Board of Directors, shall audit the status of the execution of duties by directors.
Also, to supplement the supervisory functions of the
Board of Directors, the Company established a Nomination and Compensation Committee comprising a majority of independent outside directors. At the same time, the Company has separated the supervision and execution of management and adopted an executive officer system to ensure even more prompt decision-making related to business execution.
Haruo Kanda | Director |
Masakatsu Mori | Director |
Mariko Tokuno | Director |
Yoichi Kobayashi | Director |
Shiro Sugata | Director |
Noriyuki Kuga | Director |
System | Company with an Audit & Supervisory Board |
Number of directors | 9 |
Outside directors | 5 |
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board members | 5 |
Outside auditors | 3 |
Term of directors | 1 year |
Voluntary advisory committees | Yes (Nomination and Compensation |
Committee) | |
Executive officer system in place | Yes |
Independent auditor | Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC |
Composition of the Board of Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board, and Nomination and Compensation Committee
Yoshihiro Kawasaki | Full-time Audit & |
Supervisory Board | |
Member | |
Mamoru Matsuno | Full-time Audit & |
Supervisory Board |
Member | |
Takashi Yamashita | Audit & Supervisory |
Board Member | |
Ryuji Matsuda | Audit & Supervisory |
Board Member | |
Yoshihide Shimoyama Audit & Supervisory
Board Member
*Representative Director from February 2022
Corporate Governance Framework
Outside directors
5 members (56% of all directors)
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members | Outside directors | |
3 members (60% of Audit & Supervisory | 4 members (67% of Nomination and | |
Board members) | Compensation Committee members) |
General Meeting of Shareholders |
Board of |
Directors |
Inside directors
4 members (44% of all directors)
Audit & |
Supervisory |
Board |
Inside Audit & Supervisory Board members 2 members (40% of Audit & Supervisory Board members)
Nomination |
and |
Compensation |
Committee |
Inside directors
2 members (33% of Nomination and Compensation Committee members)
Elect | Elect | Elect | ||||||||||||||||
Audit & | Nomination and | |||||||||||||||||
Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||
Supervisory | ||||||||||||||||||
Coordinate | Audit | Board of Directors | Committee | |||||||||||||||
Board | ||||||||||||||||||
Independent | ||||||||||||||||||
Report | Report | Legal | ||||||||||||||||
Make decisions / Supervise | Propose / Report | |||||||||||||||||
Change in the Composition of the Board of Directors | ||||||
July 1, 2011 | As of July 1, 2022 | |||||
Ratio of | Ratio of | |||||
outside | outside | |||||
directors | directors | |||||
4 inside directors | 33% | 4 inside directors | 56% | |||
2 outside directors | 5 outside directors (including 1 female outside director) | |||||
054 | YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | |||||
Integrated Report 2021 |
Auditor | Executive | Management Committee | CSR Division | Advisor | ||||||||||||||||
Accounting | Conference | |||||||||||||||||||
audit | ||||||||||||||||||||
Report | Propose / Report | |||||||||||||||||||
Execute | ||||||||||||||||||||
Execute | business | |||||||||||||||||||
business | ||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Division | Group Companies | |||||||||||||||||||
Internal | ||||||||||||||||||||
audit | YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | 055 | ||||||||||||||||||
Integrated Report 2021 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
Efforts to Improve Corporate Governance
Management Strategy | |||||||||||||||||||
DAN-TOTSUThree-Year | DAN-TOTSUThree-Year | KAIKAKU 2019 for | YAMATO NEXT100 | ||||||||||||||||
Plan HOP | Plan STEP | NEXT100 | One Yamato 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
2002- | 2011- | 2014- | 2017- | 2020- (YAMATO NEXT100) | |||||||||||||||
2021- (One Yamato 2023) | |||||||||||||||||||
Board of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board | Implemented evaluation of effectiveness of the Board of Directors (June 2016) | ||||||||||||||||||
Shortened the term of directors to one year (June 2003) | Appointed a female outside director (June 2017) | ||||||||||||||||||
Transitioned to a structure in which outside directors made up one-third of all directors (June 2015) | |||||||||||||||||||
Appointed outside directors (June 2005) | |||||||||||||||||||
Transitioned to a structure in which outside directors | |||||||||||||||||||
comprised one-half of all directors (June 2019) | |||||||||||||||||||
Appointed outside members as the majority of | |||||||||||||||||||
members on the Board of Directors (June 2020) | |||||||||||||||||||
Appointed outside members as the majority of mem- | |||||||||||||||||||
bers on the Audit & Supervisory Board (June 2020) | |||||||||||||||||||
Committees, etc. |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Attendance at meetings of | ||||||
Independent | Nomination and | Concurrent posts | the Board of Directors and/ | |||
Name | Compensation | Overview of Reasons for Appointment and Expected Roles | or Audit & Supervisory | |||
officer | (As of June 24, 2021) | |||||
Committee | Board during the fiscal year | |||||
ended March 31, 2021 | ||||||
• Representative of | The Company has elected Takashi Yamashita as an outside Audit & | Board of Directors: | ||||
Takashi | - | Takashi Yamashita CPA Office | Supervisory Board member in order to draw on his expertise related | 18 of 19 meetings | ||
OutsideAudit & BoardSupervisorymembers | Yamashita | • Outside Director of Shin Nippon | to finance and accounting as a certified public accountant with | Audit & Supervisory | ||
Yoshihide | • Outside Audit & Supervisory | experience as a member of the Board of Directors and an outside Audit | 15 of 15 meetings | |||
Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd. | respect to the Company's audit structure. | Board: | ||||
18 of 18 meetings | ||||||
The Company has elected Ryuji Matsuda as an outside Audit & | Board of Directors: | |||||
Ryuji | - | • Attorney-at-Law of Matsuda Law | Supervisory Board member in order to draw on his sophisticated exper- | Audit & Supervisory | ||
Matsuda | Office | |||||
tise as a lawyer with respect to the Company's audit structure. | Board: | |||||
16 of 16 meetings | ||||||
The Company has elected Yoshihide Shimoyama in order to draw on his | Board of Directors: | |||||
Shimoyama | - | Board Member of | & Supervisory Board member at other companies with respect to the | Audit & Supervisory | ||
NIPPON HUME CORPORATION | Company's audit structure. | Board: | ||||
16 of 16 meetings | ||||||
Board of Directors
Established the Nomination and Compensation Committee (June 2005) | ||||||||||
Established the Compliance and Risk Committee (August 2006) | ||||||||||
Corporate Structure and Other Systems and Initiatives | Abolished advisor position (June 2018) | |||||||||
Introduced executive officer system (June 2004) | Established Corporate Governance Guidelines (September 2015) | |||||||||
Eliminated retirement benefit system for corporate officers (June 2004) Implemented corporate officer training (October 2015)
Disclosed ROE target in medium-term management plan (January 2005) | Decided to revise officer compensation system | |||||
Introduced performance-linked compensation system (April 2005) | and introduce a performance-linked,share-based | |||||
compensation system (June 2020) | ||||||
Transitioned to a pure holding company (November 2005) | ||||||
Introduced succession plans (July 2006) | ||||||
Concurrent Posts and Main Activities of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Nomination and | Attendance at meetings | |||||
Independent | Concurrent posts | of the Board of Directors | ||||
Name | Compensation | Overview of Reasons for Appointment and Expected Roles | ||||
officer | (As of June 24, 2021) | during the fiscal year | ||||
Committee | ||||||
ended March 31, 2021 | ||||||
• Senior Advisor of International | Masakatsu Mori possesses abundant experience and considerable | |||||
insight as a corporate manager, particularly in the fields of finance and | ||||||
University of Japan | ||||||
accounting, IT and digital technology, and global business. Accordingly, | ||||||
• Outside Director of Stanley | ||||||
Masakatsu | the Company has determined that utilizing this insight to furnish | |||||
Electric Co., Ltd. | ||||||
oversight and advice from a managerial standpoint, particularly regard- | 19 of 19 meetings | |||||
Mori | • Outside Director of Kirin | |||||
ing matters of management strategy, overall encompassing business | ||||||
Holdings Company, Limited | ||||||
execution, business strategy, financial strategy, and sustainability | ||||||
• External Statutory Auditor of | ||||||
strategy, will contribute to further enhancing our management struc- | ||||||
FAST RETAILING CO., LTD. | ||||||
ture, and for this reason, he has been elected as an outside director. | ||||||
Mariko Tokuno possesses abundant experience and considerable | ||||||
insight as a corporate manager, particularly in the fields of marketing | ||||||
• Outside Director of | and sales and global business. Accordingly, the Company has deter- | |||||
mined that utilizing this insight to furnish oversight and advice from a | ||||||
Mariko | Happinet Corporation | |||||
managerial standpoint, in addition to the standpoint of customers and | 19 of 19 meetings | |||||
Tokuno | • Outside Director of | |||||
employees, particularly regarding business execution, business strategy, | ||||||
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | ||||||
and human resource strategy, will contribute to further enhancing our | ||||||
management structure, and for this reason, she has been elected as an | ||||||
outside director. | ||||||
Directors | Yoichi Kobayashi possesses abundant experience and considerable | |||||
insight as a corporate manager, particularly in the fields of marketing | ||||||
and sales and global business. Accordingly, the Company has deter- | ||||||
Outside | Yoichi | - | mined that utilizing this insight to furnish oversight and advice from a | 19 of 19 meetings | ||
Kobayashi | enhancing our management structure, and for this reason, he has been | |||||
managerial standpoint, particularly regarding business execution, | ||||||
business strategy, and investment strategy, will contribute to further | ||||||
elected as an as outside director. | ||||||
Shiro Sugata possesses abundant experience and considerable insight | ||||||
as a corporate manager, particularly in the fields of marketing and | ||||||
• Outside Director of JSR | sales, IT and digital technology, and global business. Accordingly, the | |||||
Company has determined that utilizing this insight to furnish oversight | ||||||
Shiro | Corporation | |||||
(Committee | and advice from a managerial standpoint, particularly regarding busi- | 19 of 19 meetings | ||||
Sugata | • Outside Director of Yokogawa | |||||
Chair) | ness execution, business strategy, increasing productivity, and cost | |||||
Electric Corporation | ||||||
structure reform, will contribute to further enhancing our management | ||||||
structure, and for this reason, he has been elected as an outside | ||||||
director. | ||||||
Noriyuki Kuga possesses abundant experience and considerable insight | ||||||
as a corporate manager, particularly in the fields of personnel and labor | ||||||
management, finance and accounting, and global business. Accordingly, | ||||||
Noriyuki | - | - | the Company has determined that utilizing this insight to furnish | 15 of 15 meetings | ||
Kuga | oversight and advice from a managerial standpoint, particularly regard- | |||||
ing business execution, financial strategy, and corporate governance, | ||||||
will contribute to further enhancing our management structure, and for | ||||||
this reason, he has been elected as an outside director. | ||||||
Note: Shiro Sugata took on the role of the chairman of the Nomination and Compensation Committee from June 24, 2021, taking over for Masakatsu Mori.
Roles and duties
The Board of Directors shall make important decisions concerning the Company's business and supervise the execution of duties by executive directors and executive officers.
The Board of Directors shall recognize the medium-term management plan as one of the commitments to shareholders and supervise the effectiveness of strategies, such as the Company's business portfolio and the optimal allocation of management resources, to achieve the goals of this plan. Moreover, the Board of Directors shall sufficiently analyze the initiatives aimed at realizing the goals of the medium-term management plan as well as the extent to which the plan's objectives are being achieved. In addition to providing explanations to shareholders, such analyses shall be reflected in future management plans.
The Board of Directors shall encourage executive officers to demonstrate a healthy entrepreneurial spirit and to not excessively avoid or curb risk, while at the same time establishing a framework that enables it to ensure accountability.
The scope of responsibility of each executive officer shall be decided and disclosed by the Board of Directors. Executive officers shall execute business in accordance with internal regulations.
Management
To allow Board of Directors meeting attendees the opportunity to prepare for meetings in advance, the Board of Directors secretariat shall send agenda items and related materials to directors well in advance of the meeting date and provide explanations in advance as needed.
The annual schedule of Board of Directors meetings as well as anticipated agenda items shall be decided in advance, and this information shall be provided to directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members.
The number of issues to be deliberated as well as the frequency of meetings shall be appropriately set, and the time of meetings shall be decided so as to allow sufficient time for deliberations.
As needed, meetings comprising Board of Directors
meeting attendees shall be held for the purpose of exchanging ideas, thereby encouraging lively debate.
Evaluation of effectiveness
To verify the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, the Company surveys all directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members on an annual basis regarding the composition and operational status of the Board of Directors. Based on the survey results, the Company carries out an evaluation on the Board's effectiveness in terms of such matters as the condition of the Board's operation and the state of deliberation held at Board meetings. From the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, in addition to the survey, the chair (chairperson of the Board of Directors) has begun performing interviews to further enhance the usefulness of the evaluation.
Results of Evaluation for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2021
In the effectiveness evaluation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the Company received an evaluation that the composition, management conditions, and deliberation conditions of the Board of Directors were largely appropriate as a system where the Board of Directors serves as the oversight function, and that a culture where attendees actively speak up and engage in unrestricted discussions at the Board of Directors meeting had taken hold.
Based on these results, the Company has confirmed that the Board of Directors has been able to display an effectiveness that contributes to securing sound management and achieving prompt and accurate decision-making and business execution, which are the Company's basic policies for corporate governance.
With regard to the medium-term management plan "One Yamato 2023," which was announced in January 2021, the Board of Directors conducted proactive exchanges of views and had exhaustive discussions on the effectiveness of this plan based on the changes to the external environment since the formulation of the transformation plan "YAMATO NEXT100." The Company will regularly monitor the progress of the medium-term management plan,
056 | YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. |
Integrated Report 2021 |
YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. 057 Integrated Report 2021
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
including the impact of organizational restructuring, which was implemented in April 2021.
Going forward, the Company will further strengthen corporate governance to improve the soundness of the entire Yamato Group's management structure while
continuously working to maintain and improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors for the execution of the growth strategies called for in the medium-term management plan "One Yamato 2023."
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
(Year ended March 31, 2021)
Directors and Audit & | Total compensation and | Total by compensation category (Millions of yen) | Head count of eligible | |||||
Supervisory Board members | other remuneration | Basic compensation | Performance-linked | Non-monetary | directors and Audit & | |||
(Millions of yen) | compensation | compensation, etc. | Supervisory Board members | |||||
Directors | 284 | 249 | 35 | - | 4 |
Audit & Supervisory Board
Outside directors | 69 | 69 | - | - | 5 |
Audit & Supervisory Board members | 48 | 48 | - | - | 2 |
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members | 30 | 30 | - | - | 4 |
Roles and duties
The Audit & Supervisory Board and its members shall exercise their authority proactively, and they shall appropriately state their opinions at Board of Directors meetings as well as to members of senior management.
The full-time Audit & Supervisory Board members shall attend Board of Directors meetings and other important meetings related to the execution of business, express reasonable opinions, hold effective Audit & Supervisory
Board meetings, and ensure that information is shared and that members work together in a coordinated manner. The Audit & Supervisory Board shall regularly hold information exchange meetings for the purpose of sharing information with outside directors, thereby ensuring more robust gathering of information and encouraging teamwork.
Amount of compensation and methods for calculation and | 6. Timing of delivery and conditions | |
determination | The Company pays its basic compensation (fixed compensa- | |
1. Basic compensation | tion) and short-termperformance-linked compensation (variable | |
The Company's compensation for directors is determined based | compensation) as monetary sums on a monthly basis, encom- | |
on the following factors. | passing twelve equal installments annually. | |
A competitive level of compensation | 7. Authority for decisions on compensation and other | |
· Provide rewards according to roles and responsibilities, as well | remuneration for individual directors | |
as performance, and set compensation at an adequate level to | Based on the policy for decisions resolved by the Board of | |
secure talented human resources | Directors, the Company has assigned Representative Director | |
A compensation system emphasizing the improvement of | and President Yutaka Nagao as the authority for making deci- | |
Nomination and Compensation Committee
corporate and shareholder value | sions on the amounts of basic compensation (fixed compensa- |
· Link compensation to business performance so as to motivate | tion) for individual directors and short-termperformance-linked |
directors to achieve performance goals | compensation (variable compensation) so that he can assess |
The Nomination and Compensation Committee shall comprise a majority of independent outside directors and internal directors and act as an advisory body to the Board of Directors. The committee shall deliberate on particularly important matters pertaining to nomination and compensation and present the results of these discussions to the Board of Directors in an effort to enhance management transparency.
The committee shall deliberate on matters related to the appointment or dismissal of directors, Audit & Supervisory Board members, and executive officers on the basis of business performance and multifaceted observations and
evaluations, verify the validity of such decisions, and present the results to the Board of Directors.
The committee shall propose several candidates to the Board of Directors, including candidates recommended by the serving representative to the Board of Directors, as successors to the representative director to the Board of Directors, following deliberation and based on multifac- eted observations and evaluations of candidates' track records, human nature, and other factors and verification of their appropriateness.
· Establish a compensation composition that promotes the | each of the directors while taking factors such as Companywide | |
sharing of common interests with shareholders by linking it to | business results into consideration. In order to ensure objectivity | |
corporate value over the medium to long term | and transparency, however, the representative director and | |
A fair and equitable compensation system | president is to determine respective amounts of compensation | |
· Ensure that the process for determining compensation is | for individual directors, upon having taken into consideration | |
objective and highly transparent | findings reported by the Nomination and Compensation | |
2. Compensation structure | Committee, which is chaired by one of the outside directors, | |
The Company's compensation for directors consists of basic | who constitute a majority of its membership, based on the | |
compensation (fixed compensation), which takes compensation | committee's preliminary deliberations regarding amounts of | |
levels at other companies and other such factors into consider- | compensation and other remuneration for individual directors | |
ation, and performance-linked compensation (variable compen- | along with details regarding the calculation of such amounts. | |
sation). In addition, compensation for Audit & Supervisory Board | 8. Revision of officer compensation system | |
members and outside directors consists exclusively of basic | The Company identified issues related to the officer compensa- | |
compensation due to the nature of their functional roles. | tion system, which were then reported to the Nomination and |
Support Framework for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
3. Policy for determining basic compensation (fixed compensation) | Compensation Committee and discussed repeatedly in pursuit |
Basic compensation (fixed compensation) is determined in | of the most optimal compensation system. In order to further |
accordance with rank and title and based on responsibilities, | strengthen the motivation of the Company's officers to contrib- |
The Company shall establish a support framework that enables it to provide necessary and adequate information at the necessary time to allow directors to effectively fulfill their roles and duties.
By participating in key business strategy meetings for the overall Group and by observing key Group business sites, including those overseas, participants are able to better understand the business strategies and provide opportunities to see how these strategies are being advanced.
As a system to help Audit & Supervisory Board members smoothly perform their duties, employees in the internal audit division shall be appointed to assist Audit & Supervisory Board members.
Audit & Supervisory Board members shall exercise their authority to perform investigations in accordance with the Companies Act. In addition, if a director or employee
discovers a fact that could potentially inflict marked damage on the Company, they shall immediately report this fact to an Audit & Supervisory Board member, even if there is no request to do so from an Audit & Supervisory Board member.
If a director or Audit & Supervisory Board member believes it to be necessary, they shall obtain advice from an outside expert at the Company's expense.
The internal audit division shall regularly hold meetings with the full-time Audit & Supervisory Board members, and provide audit reports in a planned manner to the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board, thereby enhancing the provision of information to, as well as bolstering coordination with, outside directors and outside Audit & Supervisory Board members.
upon having considered compensation levels at other compa- | ute to the achievement of performance goals and the creation |
nies and other such factors. | of medium- to long-term corporate value and sustainable |
4. Policy for determining performance-linked compensation | growth, and to realize a competitive compensation level for |
(variable compensation) | recruiting and retaining talented human resources, the Company |
As benchmarks pertaining to performance-linked compensation, | has decided to revise its officer compensation system. |
the Company uses operating profit to better link compensation | From the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022, the Company's |
to corporate performance and also to achieve greater transpar- | compensation for directors consists of basic compensation |
ency and objectivity. | (fixed compensation), short-termperformance-linked compensa- |
5. Policy for determining mix of compensation and other | tion (variable compensation), and medium- to long-term perfor- |
remuneration types for individual directors | mance-linked compensation (variable compensation). Outside |
The mix of compensation types is such that the higher a direc- | directors receive only basic compensation (fixed compensation). |
tor's position, the more weight is assigned to performance- | The Company is to make payment of its medium- to long- |
linked compensation. The Company has opted for this approach | term performance-linked compensation under its performance- |
upon having taken into account compensation levels at other | linked, share-based compensation system (share-based |
companies, in part because this approach makes it possible to | compensation), approved per resolution at the General Meeting |
further fuel motivation with respect to achieving performance | of Shareholders held on June 23, 2020. The Company will |
targets, generating medium- to long-term corporate value, and | accordingly make calculations based on performance bench- |
attaining sustainable growth, and also because the Company | marks for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022 and grant |
seeks to offer competitive compensation levels for recruiting | points (one point corresponds to one share) in June 2022. |
and retaining talented human resources. |
058 | YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. |
Integrated Report 2021 |
YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | 059 |
Integrated Report 2021 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
System for compensation of directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members (from the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022)
Type of Compensation | Objective and Overview | Performance | |||
Indicators | |||||
Fixed | Basic | Foster prudent execution of duties according to the scope of those duties | - | ||
compensation | Compensation levels are determined with reference to trends at compensation benchmark companies. | ||||
Set incentives for achieving diverse quantitative and qualitative performance goals | Operating | ||||
Short-term | The basic amount, which is paid upon the achievement of targets, is set as a proportion of basic compensation accord- | revenues, | |||
ing to the scope of a director's duties (with consideration given to compensation benchmarks). | operating | ||||
performance- | |||||
Through this system, certain targets are set and compensation is paid according to the level of their achievement. | profit, | ||||
linked compen- | |||||
The specific amount to be paid is determined within a range of 0% to 150% of the basic amount, according to the level | profit attribut- | ||||
sation | |||||
of achievement of performance targets for the relevant fiscal year. | able to | ||||
(incentives) | |||||
The amount determined in each fiscal year is paid in monthly installments. | owners of | ||||
parent, etc. | |||||
Variable | Align motivations for improving corporate performance over the medium to long term with the interests of shareholders | ||||
The basic amount to be paid upon 100% achievement of targets is set as a proportion of basic compensation accord- | |||||
Medium- to | |||||
ing to the scope of a director's duties (with consideration given to compensation benchmarks). | |||||
long-term | |||||
The number of points (basic points) granted to directors upon 100% achievement of targets is calculated by dividing | |||||
performance- | ROE, TSR, ESG | ||||
the basic amount by the average of the closing prices of the Company's shares at the Tokyo Stock Exchange in the | |||||
linked compen- | indicators,* | ||||
month preceding the fiscal year in which the medium-term management plan starts. | |||||
sation | etc. | ||||
The specific number of points to be granted is determined within a range of 0% to 150% of the basic points, according | |||||
(share-based | |||||
to the level of achievement of indicators in the Company's medium-term management plan. | |||||
compensation) | |||||
In principle, medium- to long-termperformance-linked compensation is provided in a lump sum in the form of shares | |||||
upon retirement. | |||||
* From the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022, the ESG indicator has been set as "greenhouse gas emissions."
9. Other
the facts, enact the necessary response and corrections, and promote measures to prevent a reoccurrence.
From an operational standpoint, we promote specific response procedures, processing methods, and risk-assessment criteria that are shared on a Groupwide basis. This enables us to prevent the overlooking of major risks by adopting a consistent management flow and response to all reports received. Furthermore, by clarifying the persons responsible for decision-making at the time reports are received and unifying relevant standards, we are improving our level of risk awareness. We prevent the reoccurrence of issues by formulating rules for holding verification meetings internally to ensure that we carry out an appropriate investigation and response. Additionally, we implement the standardized management of whistle-blowing information and the details of responses on a Groupwide basis, thereby allowing us to ascertain Groupwide trends and share examples of actual cases in a cross-organizational manner. Such information and details are reported regularly to the Board of Directors, helping to facilitate improvements across the Group.
To further reinforce our compliance management, the whistle-blower system was registered under the Whistleblowing Compliance Management System (WCMS) (declaration of conformity registration system) of Japan's Consumer Affairs Agency in July 2020.
WCMS symbol
Building Solid Relationships through Survey Results The Yamato Group conducts business partner questionnaires of contractors, and suppliers of equipment and other business necessities, as an initiative aimed at implementing and realizing its Corporate Stance. The results of these surveys are used to promote improvements and strengthen communication toward the development of strong and lasting relationships with our business partners.
A certain percentage of the monetary compensation shall be allocated to the purchase of shares of the Company through the Officers and Executives' Shareholding Association.
Policy on Cross-Shareholdings
Business Continuity Plan
The Company has a policy of owning stocks that are deemed meaningful based on comprehensive consideration from a medium- to long-term perspective of the relationship with the Group's businesses, the profitability of the Company, and the potential for creating new business opportunities, among other factors. A decision shall be made every year at the Board of Directors meeting concerning whether to continue holding the stocks based on careful consideration of various factors including previous business transactions with the Company and the market price of the shares, and after verifying the benefits and risks
associated with holding the stocks from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. The Company works to reduce the number of stocks it owns that are deemed to be of little significance.
In exercising the voting rights of shares held, the decision to support or oppose agenda items at the sharehold- ers' meeting shall be made on a case-by-case basis, with consideration given to the issuing company's enhancement of corporate value, the issuing company's compliance framework, and the possibility of a negative impact on the Group's business, among other factors.
As a corporate group that offers the TA-Q-BIN service as a part of social infrastructure, the Yamato Group has formulated a business continuity plan (BCP) to ensure that it can keep offering services in a steady manner even under unforeseeable circumstances. Based on the experience gained after the Great East Japan Earthquake and other disasters, we are anticipating various emergency scenarios in an effort to reinforce our crisis management system on a Groupwide basis.
We have also established the Yamato Group BCP Basic Policy, which is supported by the three pillars of giving the utmost priority to human life, aiming for the prompt
recovery of operations at each Group company, and meeting the expectations of local community members as a part of social infrastructure. Guided by this policy, we have determined various Groupwide standards and have created a wide range of manuals in accordance with the business continuity of each Group company.
Going forward, we will strengthen our response to dealing with damage from natural disasters such as earthquakes, for which damage is expected to be large in scale, and flooding caused by heavy rain and other factors. At the same time, we will promote extensive examinations of various risks that could impact our business continuity.
Compliance
Strengthening internal control for the Group overall | Enhancing the whistle-blower system | |
The Yamato Group has established an internal control | The Yamato Group has established a whistle-blower system | |
system in order to promote a sound corporate culture in | to promptly discover and appropriately respond to law and/ | |
the Group as a whole and to enable employees to perform | or internal regulation violations. In addition to compliance- | |
their duties effectively and efficiently without any misbehav- | related issues, such as corruption and human rights viola- | |
ior or mistakes. Having stipulated its basic policy on the | tions, the whistle-blower system accepts reports on any | |
internal control system in accordance with the Companies | action that violates internal regulations and the Group's | |
Act, each Group company is working on strengthening inter- | Management Philosophy. In addition to conventional con- | |
nal control. | tact points, such as the president, Compliance and Risk | |
Additionally, in order to respond to the internal control | Committee members, and external lawyers, in February | |
report system pursuant to the Financial Instruments and | 2019 the Group established an independent contact point | |
Exchange Act, we are promoting reviews of business rules | for Group companies, thereby securing an appropriate | |
and the standardization of operations, checking whether | structure for whistle-blowing. The Group's whistle-blowing | |
operations have been effectively performed in accordance | regulations protect the privacy of whistle-blowers and | |
with the rules, and establishing a system to immediately put | ensure that they do not suffer any unfair treatment as a | |
improvements in place should there be any shortcomings. | result of making a report. To create an environment that | |
Internal control over the financial reporting of the | encourages whistle-blowing, the Group carries out investiga- | |
Yamato Group as of March 31, 2021 was considered valid, | tions of all reports, whether whistle-blowers are anonymous | |
and a report was submitted to the Kanto Local Finance | or provide their real name. When a report is made on an | |
Bureau. | issue, the whistle-blower system works to promptly confirm | |
060 | YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | |
Integrated Report 2021 |
Accountability
The Yamato Group considers the explanation of corporate | established the Disclosure Policy in order to disclose and | |||
and management data to shareholders, investors, and other | manage information in a more appropriate manner and | |||
stakeholders to be an important corporate governance | enhance the reliability of that information. | |||
issue and is committed to the speedy, accurate, and fair | The main investor relations activities are listed below. | |||
disclosure of information. Furthermore, the Group has | ||||
Item | Number of times | Content | ||
Settlement of accounts meetings for | 4 | The first-quarter meeting is held by telephone with the chief financial officer. Meetings for the second, third, | ||
analysts and institutional investors | and fourth quarters are held with the president. | |||
Visits by the president to investors | 1 or more per year | The president or chairman makes regular overseas visits to investors in the United States, Europe, and Asia to | ||
explain management policies. | ||||
in the United States, Europe, and Asia | to each region | |||
Note: Conducted via teleconference from February 2020 on in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic | ||||
Small meetings with the president | 2 per year | Creating regular opportunities for direct dialogue with management | ||
Management plan briefings and | 2 or more per year | Creating regular opportunities to promote understanding of business operations | ||
facility tours | Note: Since February 2020, certain briefings and tours have not been carried out in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. | |||
Integrated reports, financial results, news releases, securities reports, and quarterly reports; materials per- | ||||
Website for investor relations | - | taining to settlement of accounts meetings, convocation notices for the ordinary general meeting of share- | ||
materials | holders, notices of resolution, and disclosure of voting results. Publication of most important information in | |||
two languages-Japanese and English-so that information can be communicated to foreign investors. | ||||
Establishment of IR department | - | Responsible for developing IR strategies to initiate dialogue with shareholders and other investors and | ||
disclosing information | ||||
061 | ||||
YAMATO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | ||||
Integrated Report 2021 |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Yamato Holdings Co. Ltd. published this content on 15 March 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 15 March 2022 06:39:10 UTC.