GALLANT-1: GB1211 Galectin-3(Gal-3) inhibitor plus atezolizumab (atz) for first line treatment in patients (pts) | 1460P |
with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Francisco de Asis Aparisi,1 Enriqueta Felip,2 Eric Pichon,3 Enric Carcereny,4 Patricia Barre,5 Rodryg Ramlau,6 Tariq Sethi,7 Bertil Lindmark,7 Robert Slack,7 Alison MacKinnon,7 Vassilios Aslanis,7 De Phung,7 Pia Jensen,7 Zahir Rajiwate,7 Graham Ross,7 Linda Basse,7 François Ghiringhelli8
1Medical Oncology Department, Unidad de Biomarcadores y Medicina de Precisión (UBYMP), Hospital La Fe, IISLAFE, Valencia, Spain; 2Vall d' Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; 3Service de Pneumologie, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France; 4Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; 5Department of Thoracic Oncology, Montpellier Regional University Hospital, Montpellier, France; 6Department of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland; 7Galecto Biotech AB., Copenhagen, Denmark; 8University of Burgundy, Genetic and Immunotherapy Medical Institute, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Background
- Galectin-3(Gal-3) is a lymphocyte activation gene-3 ligand, the expression of which is associated with tumour resistance to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs).1
- In a preclinical study, Gal-3 inhibitor GB1211 restored CPI-binding to their targets in the presence of Gal-3, and enhanced CPI effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mouse models.2,3
- Atezolizumab (atz), an anti-programmeddeath-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody, is a CPI; response rates of 22-38% have been observed with atz monotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC,4,5 suggesting there may be a benefit with a GB1211 + atz combination.
- The GALLANT-1 study (NCT05240131) will assess tolerability of the combination GB1211 + atz and whether GB1211 + atz increases anti-tumour effects in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Methods
- GALLANT-1is a Phase IB/IIA study of first line GB1211 + atz in patients with measurable advanced stage 3B/4 or metastatic NSCLC, expressing PD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells
- Concomitant chemotherapy was not permitted
- The study consists of three parts (Figure 1).
- Primary endpoints include safety and tolerability (Parts A, B and C), and tumour shrinkage (Part B only).
- Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria) and pharmacokinetic measurements.
- Pharmacokinetic serial blood sampling occurred over 12 hours on Days 1 and 21 (6 samples/day) and sparse sampling over 8 hours on Days 42 and 84 (3 samples/day)
- Plasma concentrations of GB1211 were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection; the lower limit of quantification was 0.500 ng/mL
- Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using non-compartmental methods and were compared with data from a first-in-human (FIH) study in healthy volunteers (HV) (NCT03809052) as well as with predictions based on pharmacokinetic data from HV.6
- Peripheral immune response was characterised by Chip Cytometry (Canopy Biosciences) at baseline and 12 weeks.
- Here we report data from the ongoing Part A.
Summary
- This is the first clinical study to show that combining the oral Gal-3 inhibitor GB1211 with atz may enhance the CPI effect
- Although there is not enough data to determine the exact response rate of atz in this population, there may be a possible benefit with GB1211 + atz, thus further research into the combination is warranted.
- Overall, the safety profile of GB1211 + atz appeared to be manageable, with predominantly Grade 1-2 TEAEs observed
- The severe skin reactions observed may indicate lymphocyte activation, in line with the GB1211 mode of action; as these skin rashes were not observed in the 100 mg group, there may be a therapeutic window.
- In this initial analysis, four patients achieved a PR (4/10; 40%), three of which were in the 100 mg recommended Phase II dose cohort (3/5; 60%), indicating that there appears to be a potential benefit to the GB1211 + atz combination.
- Pharmacokinetics were predictable and consistent with simulations based on the FIH study in HV and in patients with NSCLC.
Scan the QR code to access a downloadable version of this poster
Copies of this poster obtained through QR Code are for personal use only and may
not be reproduced without permission from the lead author of this poster
Safety
• | Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in the 200 mg and 100 mg cohorts are shown in Table 1. |
• | A total of eight serious AEs (SAEs) were observed: six SAEs in the 200 mg cohort (n = 7) and two SAEs in the |
100 mg cohort (n = 6) (Table 2). | |
- The reason for qualifying as an SAE was hospitalisation in seven cases and prolonged hospitalisation in one case |
Efficacy
- The best response for the evaluable patients in the 100 mg cohort are shown in Figure 2A
- In the 200 mg cohort, 4/7 patients were not evaluable due to withdrawn consent (n = 2), skin toxicity and urinary tract infection/skin toxicity (n = 1 each)
- In the 100 mg cohort, 2/6 patients were not evaluable due to withdrawn consent and being withdrawn due to AEs (n = 1 each).
-
Excluding three patients who withdrew their consent, 4/10 (40%) patients achieved a response across both cohorts; in the 100 mg recommended Phase II dose cohort, five patients had measurable disease at baseline and
≥1 subsequent scan, and three of these five patients (60%) achieved a response - Four patients achieved a partial response (PR): one in the 200 mg cohort (at Week 18), and three in the 100 mg cohort (one at Week 6, two at Week 12; Figure 2A); all responses are ongoing, with a median (range) duration of response of 29 (14-45) weeks
- Three patients had progressive disease (PD): two in the 200 mg cohort (one at Week 6 and one at Week 12, after achieving stable disease [SD] at Week 6), and one in the 100 mg cohort (Week 6).
- Despite some variability at baseline, where trends for increased serum Gal-3 at baseline were observed for responders (n = 4), the percentage change indicates that patients with PR had stable or declining serum Gal-3, while those who progressed had increased serum Gal-3 (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Best response at each timepoint in evaluable patients in the 100 mg cohort (A) and serum Gal-3 levels recorded at baseline and Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (B)
A | B | Absolute level | |||||||||
3ng/mL | 50 | ||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||
30 | |||||||||||
Gal- | |||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||
PD | Serum | 10 | 200 mg PR | ||||||||
0 | 100 mg PR | ||||||||||
Patients | SD | PR | −31.3% | ||||||||
Baseline | Week 3 | Week 6 | Week 12 | ||||||||
100 mg PR | |||||||||||
baseline | Percentage baseline | 100 mg PR | |||||||||
SD | PR | PR | −30.6% | ||||||||
200 | 200 mg PD | ||||||||||
PR | PR | PR | PR | PR | −73.3% | 150 | 200 mg PD | ||||
3 % | |||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||
Gal- | 50 | ||||||||||
Serum | |||||||||||
Figure 1. GALLANT-1 study design
Part A |
Dose confirmation study
(open-label)
Screening | Baseline | Sentinel group: |
GB1211 200 mg BID | ||
+ atz 1200 mg q3w | ||
Dose de-escalation: |
GB1211 100 mg BID + atz 1200 mg q3w
Screening | Randomisation |
Part B |
Safety and efficacy study
(double-blind)
Patients receiving
GB1211 100 mg BID + atz
Patients receiving
placebo† + atz
Primary outcome assessment
Part C* |
Long term safety study
(open-label)
Continued treatment
with GB1211 + atz
until unacceptable toxicity
or disease progression
- Four SAEs were Grade 2 and four were Grade 3-4; no Grade 3-4 events were seen in the 100 mg cohort |
- No SAEs were deemed related to GB11211 only. |
• After two weeks of therapy, two severe (Grade 3-4)immune-related skin rashes were observed: pemphigus |
deemed related to atz, and perivascular lymphocytic infiltration deemed related to GB1211 + atz |
- Both responded well to steroids |
- Per protocol, based on the two immune-related skin rashes, it was recommended by the safety data monitoring board that the |
study continue but with a reduced dose (100 mg BID). |
Table 1. TEAEs observed during Part A of GALLANT-1
Patients with at least one of the following, n | 200 mg cohort (n = 7) | 100 mg cohort (n = 6) |
TEAE | 64 | 34 |
Serious | 7 | 2 |
GB1211-related* | 17 | 12 |
0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | 36 | 42 | 0 | |||
Weeks | Baseline | Week 3 | Week 6 | Week 12 | |||||||
Percentages after the bars represent changes in tumour size from baseline to the most recent scan.
Pharmacokinetics
• | The pharmacokinetics of GB1211 in combination with atz in patients with NSCLC was not altered when comparing |
with HV from the FIH study (Table 3). | |
• | Steady-state plasma exposure and accumulation at 100 mg BID were similar between patients with NSCLC and HV |
at the same dose from the FIH study. | |
• | Steady-state plasma exposure at 200 mg BID in patients with NSCLC was as expected and was consistent with |
pharmacokinetic simulations based on the FIH study at 100 mg BID in HV and in patients with NSCLC. |
≤2 weeks‡ 12 weeks overall assessment ≤2 weeks‡ 12 weeks assessment§Week 12 onwards
*Part C includes patients from Parts A and B, who have achieved clinical benefit from the study drug in either Part A or Part B; † Matched to GB1211 dosing;
‡Between Day −14 and Day −1; §Continuation of blinded treatment until the last patient has received 12-weeks of treatment. BID, twice a day; q3w, every three weeks.
Results
Baseline patient demographics
- As of the final data cutoff (30 September 2023), 13 patients have been enrolled: seven patients in the 200 mg cohort and six patients in the 100 mg cohort.
- A total of four patients are currently on treatment and nine patients have discontinued
- Reasons for discontinuation in the 200 mg cohort include: disease progression (n = 2), adverse events (AEs; n = 3) and withdrawn consent (n = 1)
- Reasons for discontinuation in the 100 mg cohort include: disease progression (n = 1), AEs (n = 1) and withdrawn consent (n = 1).
- At baseline, the median (range) age was 64 (48-79) years and 10 (76%) patients were male.
- No patients had received treatment for NSCLC stage IIIA or lower.
- Median (range) total weeks on treatment was 14 (6-45) weeks, in evaluable patients only (defined as patients who have had ≥1 post-baseline scan [at Week 6])
- In the 200 mg cohort, the median (range) total weeks on treatment was 12 (6-45) weeks
- In the 100 mg cohort, the median (range) total weeks on treatment was 18 (6-36) weeks.
Serious GB1211-related* | 2 | 0 |
Grade 1 | 33 | 20 |
Grade 2 | 24 | 13 |
Grade ≥3 | 7 | 1 |
Leading to study drug discontinuation | 4 | 0 |
Fatal | 0 | 0 |
*As assessed by the investigator.
Table 2. SAEs observed during Part A of GALLANT-1
AE TERM | Grade | Relationship | Action study drug | Outcome (days | |
(Days since onset after 1st dose) | GB1211 | atz | since onset) | ||
Major malnutrition (41) | 3 | No | No | GB1211 interrupted | Recovered (8) |
Streptococcus urinary tract infection (13) | 2 | No | No | GB1211 interrupted | Recovered (10) |
Autoimmune pemphigus (13) | 3 | No | Yes | Discontinued | Recovered (17) |
Bone marrow hypocellularity (33) | 4 | Yes | Yes | NA | Ongoing* |
Ischaemic stroke (82) | 2 | No | No | NA | Not recovered |
Skin toxicity (9) | 4 | Yes | Yes | Discontinued | Recovered (25) |
Pulmonary infection (18)† | 2 | No | No | GB1211 interrupted | Recovered (13) |
Weakness (8)† | 2 | No | No | No action to study drug | Recovered (4) |
*Weekly thrombocyte infusion; † 100 mg cohort. NA, not applicable.
Table 3. Comparison between geometric mean (geometric mean CV%) plasma exposure pharmacokinetic parameters of GB1211 in GALLANT-1 Part A (patients with NSCLC) and in the FIH study (HV)
FIH study3 | GALLANT-1 Part A | FIH study3 | GALLANT-1 Part A | |||||
HV | NSCLC | HV | NSCLC | |||||
100 mg | 100 mg BID | 100 mg BID | 100 mg BID | 100 mg BID | 200 mg | 200 mg BID | 200 mg BID | |
single dose | Day 1 | Day 21 | Day 1 | Day 21 | single dose | Day 1 | Day 21 | |
AUClast* (h.ng/mL) | 5910 (18.8) | - | - | 3640 (113) | 6820 (95.0) | 11500 (36.5) | 7380 (33.2) | 14900 (26.2) |
AUCtau† (h.ng/mL) | - | 3560 (42.9) | 7530 (21.1) | 5360 (63.7) | 6820 (95.0) | - | 8050 (33.5) | 14900 (26.2) |
Cmax (ng/mL) | 525 (23.6) | 546 (53.5) | 975 (21.9) | 620 (54.9) | 905 (72.5) | 1010 (54.1) | 1290 (42.7) | 2080 (14.5) |
RAAUCtau‡ | - | - | 2.11 (31.4) | - | 1.79 (17.1) | - | - | 1.69 (14.1) |
RACmax‡ | - | - | 1.79 (39.6) | - | 1.67 (13.2) | - | - | 1.38 (29.7) |
*Up to 48 hours for SD, up to 12 hours for BID; † Up to 12 hours; ‡Ratio between Day 1 and Day 10 (FIH study) or between Day 1 and Day 21 (GALLANT-1).
AUClast, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration; AUCtau, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (12 hours); Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; CV%, coefficient of variation; RAAUCtau, accumulation ratio based on AUCtau; RACmax, accumulation ratio based on Cmax.
Acknowledgements: GALLANT-1 was sponsored by Galecto Biotech AB; atezolizumab was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The authors would like to acknowledge Manolo D'Arcangelo of Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, and Jarosław Kołb-Sielecki of Samodzielny Publiczny Zespol Gruzlicy i Chorob Pluc w Olsztynie, for their involvement in the enrolment of patients in the study. Third-party medical writing assistance, under the direction of all authors, was provided by Roisin Weaver, MSc of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by Galecto Biotech AB.
Disclosures: FA: advisory role at Sanofi; speaker's bureau for Takeda; travel, accommodations, expenses from Pfizer. Email address: francisco_aparisi@iislafe.es
References: 1. Mabbitt et al. Front Immunol 2023;14:1250559; 2. Mabbitt et al. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(16)suppl:2607; 3. Vuong et al. Cancer Res 2019;79(7):1480-92; 4. Herbst et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383(14):1328-39; 5. Peters et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(24):2781-9; 6. Aslanis et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023;91:267-80.
This work was sponsored by Galecto Inc. | Presented at ESMO Congress | 20-24 October, 2023 | Madrid, Spain |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Galecto Inc. published this content on 23 October 2023 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 23 October 2023 12:27:37 UTC.