Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.3572 USD | +8.37% |
|
-29.53% | -59.17% |
06-21 | Futures Down Pre-Bell as Traders Wait for Market Direction Cues; Asia, Europe Fall | MT |
06-20 | Nikola to Implement 1-for-30 Reverse Stock Split; Shares Plunge | MT |
Summary
- Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a relative ranking of the company within its sector, comes out particularly poor.
Strengths
- The prospective high growth for the next fiscal years is among the main assets of the company
- For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
- For several months, analysts have been revising their EPS estimates roughly upwards.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
Weaknesses
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- The company's enterprise value to sales, at 4.19 times its current sales, is high.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-59.17% | 485M | D+ | ||
-52.26% | 18.96B | C- | ||
-56.01% | 10.27B | D | ||
-53.41% | 9.12B | - | ||
-52.59% | 8.9B | D+ | ||
-47.02% | 7.3B | B | ||
-40.86% | 5.74B | D+ | ||
0.00% | 5.24B | - | - | |
0.00% | 4.74B | - | - | |
-25.35% | 4.57B | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- NKLA Stock
- Ratings Nikola Corporation