Accelerating ADC
Innovation
…because patients are waiting
Virtual Analyst & Investor Day
January 5, 2021
Legal Disclaimer
This presentation contains "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts and are based on management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning Mersana Therapeutics, Inc.'s (the "Company's") business strategy and the design, progression and timing of its clinical trials, the ability of the single-arm UPLIFT cohort to enable registration, expectations regarding future clinical trial results based on data achieved to date, and the sufficiency of the Company's cash on hand.
Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by terms such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "contemplates," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "goal," "intends," "may," "on track," "opportunity," "plans," "poised for," "possible," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "promises to be," "seeks," "should," "target," "will," "would" or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms. Forward-looking statements represent management's beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this presentation. The Company's operations involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside its control, and any one of which, or combination of which, could materially affect its results of operations and whether the forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be correct. Factors that may materially affect the Company's results of operations and whether these forward-looking statements prove to be correct include, among other things, that preclinical testing or early clinical results may not be predictive of the results or success of ongoing or later clinical trials, regulatory changes, particularly with respect to the change in the U.S. presidential administration, the FDA's review of the protocol for our study of the single-arm UPLIFT cohort, and that the development and testing of the Company's product candidates will take longer and/or cost more than planned, as well as those listed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 28, 2020, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2020 and subsequent SEC filings. In addition, while we expect that the COVID-19 pandemic might adversely affect the Company's preclinical and clinical development efforts, business operations and financial results, the extent of the impact on the Company's operations and the value of and market for the Company's common stock will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, physical distancing and business closure requirements in the U.S. and in other countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken globally to contain and treat the disease. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Copies of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings are available by visiting EDGAR on the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
2
Today's Agenda
Topic | Speaker |
Opening Remarks | Anna Protopapas, President & CEO |
XMT-1536 Pivotal Registration Strategy in | Arvin Yang, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer |
Ovarian Cancer | |
Debra L. Richardson, MD, Associate Professor and | |
XMT-1536 Phase 1 Ovarian Cancer | Section Chief, Division of Gynecological Oncology at |
Expansion Study Data Update | OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center and the Sarah |
Cannon Research Institute | |
Ovarian Cancer Market Dynamics and | Brian DeSchuytner, SVP Finance & Product Strategy |
XMT-1536 Opportunities | |
XMT-1660B7-H4 ADC Development | Tim Lowinger, PhD, Chief Science & Technology Officer |
Candidate | |
Closing Remarks: 2021 Corporate Goals & | Anna Protopapas, President & CEO |
Anticipated Milestones | |
Q&A | |
3
2020 Was a Transformative Year for Mersana
XMT-1536
(NaPi2b Dolaflexin)
XMT-1592
(NaPi2b Dolasynthen)
XMT-1660
(B7-H4 DolaLock ADC)
XMT-2056
(1st Immunosynthen ADC)
Corporate
Q1 2020 | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | Q4 2020 | Q1 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SGO: | ASCO: | ESMO and | Today's Strategic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MTD, Proof of | Proof-of-Concept | Fast Track | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Update | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activity in NSCLC | in Ovarian Cancer | Designation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Initiated Dose | AACR: Preclinical | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Escalation | Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declared | Disclosed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AACR: Preclinical | Disclosed Dev't | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strengthened | Added | Added | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Experienced SVP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Experienced CMO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended 2020 with Approximately $255 M in Cash,
Funding Current Operating Plan for at Least the Next Two Years
Poised for Significant Value Inflection Points and Continued Momentum in 2021
- XMT-1536in Ovarian
- XMT-1536In NSCLC
- XMT-1592
- XMT-1660(B7-H4)
- XMT-2056(Immunosynthen)
Initiate Single-Arm
Registration Strategy
Seek to Achieve Proof-of-Concept
Complete Dose Escalation
IND-Enabling Studies
IND-Enabling Studies
Initiate Lifecycle
Management Studies /
Combinations
Select Lead in NSCLC
IND Submission
Q1 2022
IND Submission
Q1 2022
5
XMT-1536 Has a New Name
upifitamab rilsodotin
or UpRi, for short
6
UpRi (XMT-1536): An Opportunity to Deliver a Potentially Foundational Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
- In a heavily-pretreated ovarian cancer population:
- Proof of concept, >30% ORR in ovarian cancer with higher NaPi2b expression
- Activity, including CRs, in patients failing platinum, bevacizumab, and/or PARPi
- No severe neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy or ocular toxicity
- Biomarker identification for improved patient outcomes
Earlier Lines of
Therapy
New Combinations
Single-Arm
Registration
Strategy in Platinum
Resistant Disease
INCREASING MARKET POTENTIAL | . |
7
UpRi (XMT-1536):First-in-Class Dolaflexin
ADC Targeting NaPi2b
Single-Arm Registration Strategy in
Ovarian Cancer
Arvin Yang, MD, PhD
Chief Medical Officer
UPLIFT Strategy: Key Areas Discussed with FDA
Strategy Informed by End of Phase Meeting and Meeting Minutes
- Population with high unmet medical need
- Performance of current standard of care
- Design of single-arm registration cohort
- Primary and secondary endpoints
- Biomarker validation strategy
9
Appropriate Benchmarks for Current Standard of Care in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
With PARPi and bevacizumab increasingly used in earlier lines, the
current standard of care is single agent chemotherapies
Historical Comparison for | |||
UPLIFT Population | |||
Study | Demographics | Control Arm | Control Arm Performance |
Forward I | 1 - 3 Prior | PLD, Topotecan, Weekly | ORR 12% |
ESMO 2019 | Median 2 Prior | Paclitaxel | |
Prior PARPi: 10% | |||
Prior Bev: 47% | |||
Javelin 200 | 1 - 3 Prior | PLD | ORR 4% |
SGO 2019 | Median 2 Prior | ||
Corail | 1 - 3 Prior | PLD or Topotecan | ORR 12% |
ESMO 2018 | Median 2 Prior | ||
Prior PARPi: 5% | |||
Prior Bev: 46% |
10
UPLIFT: Single-Arm Registration Strategy in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Patient Population:
No Pre-Selection for NaPi2b
Inclusion Criteria:
Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer
1 - 4 Prior Lines
Exclusion Criteria:
1 - 2 Prior Lines Bev-naïve
Primary Platinum Refractory Disease
Global: | Dose: | N: |
US, Europe, | ||
43 mg/m2 q4w | ~180 Patients | |
Australia, Canada | ||
Primary Endpoint:
Confirmed ORR in higher NaPi2b
Key Secondary Endpoint:
Confirmed ORR in overall population
Other Secondary Endpoints:
- Duration of Response
- Safety
11
Significant Time Advantage in Amending with the Single-Arm UPLIFT Cohort
UPLIFT will be operationalized as an amendment as opposed to initiating a new study
Objective
- Determine safety and MTD: 43 mg/m2
- Proof of concept achieved June 2020
- Expansion cohort serves as training set for NaPi2b biomarker
- Demonstrate clinically meaningful outcome
- Validate NaPi2b Biomarker
First in Human to Pivotal Cohort in One Study
Dose Escalation
Cohort
(Enrollment Complete in
March 2020)
Ovarian Cancer Expansion Cohort
(Enrollment August 2019 - Q1 2021)
UPLIFT: Single-Arm Registration Strategy in
Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer
(Planning Patient Dosing in Q1 2021)
12
Strategy to Deliver a Robust and Reproducible
Commercial Diagnostic Assay
Ovarian Cancer Expansion Cohort and | UPLIFT: Single-Arm Registration Strategy in | |
Relevant Doses from Escalation Cohort | Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer | |
- NaPi2b expression assessed with clinical assay in >80 patients
- "Train" proposed commercial assay
- Repeat assessment on all samples
- Ensures same read regardless of lab and pathologist
- Determine cutoff for UPLIFT Pivotal Cohort based on full data set
- Prospectively-definedretrospective analysis validates NaPi2b biomarker cutoff with proposed commercial assay
- Enroll without NaPi2b biomarker selection
- Evaluate both NaPi2b biomarker higher and overall population
- Optionality for either companion diagnostic or complementary diagnostic assay
13
UPLIFT Registration Strategy Creates Potential for Speed and Label Differentiation
- Streamlined Execution
- Leverages expansion cohort enrollment momentum in high unmet need population for single-arm registration path
- Broad Target Population
- Includes patients with 4 prior lines of therapy, a broader population than historical studies in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
- Includes bevacizumab-naïve patients with 3 - 4 prior lines of therapy, accommodating differences in bevacizumab use in early disease
- No pre-selection accelerates enrollment and provides potential upside opportunity for broad label regardless of NaPi2b expression level
- Assay Validation Process
- Training and validation method designed to support a commercial assay
Planning to Initiate UPLIFT Patient Dosing in Q1 2021
14
UpRi (XMT-1536):First-in-Class Dolaflexin
ADC Targeting NaPi2b
Phase 1 Ovarian Cancer Expansion Cohort
Data Update
Debra L. Richardson, MD
Associate Professor and Section Chief, Division of
Gynecological Oncology at OU Health Stephenson Cancer
Center and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute
The following information is from an ongoing study and based on December 3, 2020 data cut
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients, their families and caregivers for their contribution to this study
UNTED STATES | UNITED STATES | |
Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA | START Midwest, Grand Rapids, MI | |
Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, AZ | Stephenson Cancer Centre, Oklahoma City, OK | |
Billings Clinic, Billings, MT | Texas Oncology, Austin, TX | |
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA | Texas Oncology Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX | |
Emory University, Atlanta, GA | Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX | |
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA | University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL | |
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL | University of Colorado, Aurora, CO | |
Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI | University of Florida, Gainesville, FL | |
Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center, Greenville, SC | University of Miami, Miami, FL | |
Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA | |
Levine Cancer Center, Charlotte, NC | University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN | |
Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX | University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT | |
Maryland Oncology and Hematology, Rockville, MD | Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA | |
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA | Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA | |
Mount Sinai, New York City, NY | Washington University, St. Louis, MO | |
NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX | Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Eugene, OR | |
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Hilliard, OH | CANADA | |
Oncology and Hematology Assoc. of SW VA, Inc., Roanoke, VA | McGill University (Glen-Cedars Cancer Center), Montreal | |
QUEST Research Institute, Royal Oak, MI | British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver | |
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, LLP, Denver, CO | AUSTRALIA | |
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN | Lifehouse Australia as trustee for the Lifehouse Australia Trust, Camperdown | |
START, San Antonio, TX | Peter MacCallum Center, Melbourne, Victoria | 16 |
Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria |
Design for the Ovarian Cancer Cohort of the XMT-1536 (UpRi) Phase 1 Expansion Study
Ovarian Cancer Cohort
- 1-3prior lines in platinum resistant
- 4 prior lines regardless of platinum status
- High grade serous histology
- Archived tumor and fresh biopsy (if medically feasible) for NaPi2b
Patient population: High grade serous ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer) progressing after standard treatments
- Measurable disease per RECIST v1.1
- ECOG Performance Status 0 or 1
Dosing: IV every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
- 36 mg/m2 cohort initiated in August 2019 and enrollment closed
- 43 mg/m2 cohort initiated in December 2019 and ongoing; current dose evaluated in EXP
Primary Objectives:
- Exclusion: primary platinum-resistant defined as lack of response or disease progression within 3 mos after completing front-line platinum containing therapy
Abbreviations: mos = months; EXP = expansion; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; MTD = maximum tolerated dose; ORR = objective response rate; DCR = disease control rate; DOR = duration of response
1Tolcher TW et al. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 3010)
2Richardson DL et al. Presented at SGO Annual Meeting 2020; LBA8
3 Hamilton E et al. Presented during the 2020European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Congress
- Evaluate safety and tolerability of MTD
- Assess preliminary efficacy (ORR, DCR)
Secondary Objectives:
- Association of tumor NaPi2b expression and objective tumor response using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay with a broad dynamic range to distinguish tumors with higher and lower NaPi2b expression (as previously reported1,2,3)
- Further assessment of preliminary anti-neoplastic activity (DOR)
Assessments:
- Tumor imaging (MRI or CT): baseline and every 2nd cycle; response assessed per RECIST
v1.1 | 17 |
Patient Demographics and Disease Characteristics
Data cut off: 03 December 2020
Ovarian Cancer Expansion Patients (N = 72)
Age; years | Median (range) | 68 (33, 87) | |
ECOG Performance Status; n (%) | 0 | 26 | (36) |
1 | 46 | (64) | |
Primary Tumor Typea; n (%) | Ovarian | 55 | (76) |
Fallopian Tube | 11 | (15) | |
Primary Peritoneal | 6 | (8) | |
Prior Lines of Therapy; n (%) | 1-3 | 47 | (65) |
4+b | 25 | (35) | |
Prior Therapy; n (%) | Bevacizumab | 48 | (67) |
PARP inhibitor | 42 | (58) | |
Platinum-free Intervalc; n (%) | 0-3 mos | 26 | (36) |
>3-6 mos | 39 | (54) | |
>6 mosd | 6 | (8) | |
Unknowne | 1 | (1) | |
BRCA1/2 Mutation; n (%) | Yes | 11 | (15) |
No | 52 | (72) | |
Unknownf | 9 (13) | ||
Determined | 54 | (75) | |
NaPi2b H-scoreg; n (%) | Higher | 37 | (69) |
Lower | 17 | (31) | |
Not Yet Determined (ND) | 18 | (25) |
a Includes 1 Endometrioid, 1 Low Grade, 1 Serous / Endometroid, and 1 Carcinosarcoma histology. b Three patients enrolled with 5 prior lines of systemic therapy. c Platinum-free interval defined as the time between the last cycle of most recent platinum-containing regimen and evidence of disease progression; determined from treatment dates and/or clinic notes. d All patients are platinum-sensitive and had received 4 or 5 lines of prior therapy.
e Treatment dates missing/not provided; unable to determine. f BRCA1/2 mutation status not available/not reported. g Higher NaPi2b Expression: as defined in dose escalation as at / above lowest H-score at which response
observed (≥110); Lower NaPi2b Expression: as defined in dose escalation as below the lowest H-score at which response observed (<110); ND = NaPi2b Expression not yet determined or tissue not available
18
XMT-1536 (UpRi) Continues to Have a Consistent Tolerability Profile
- 63 (88%) patients reported at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)
- No Grade ≥ 3 (severe) TRAEs of neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, or ocular toxicity have been reported
TRAEs Reported in ≥20% of Patients with Ovarian Cancer (N = 72)
a
b
c
d
aFatigue includes preferred terms of asthenia and fatigue; bAST increase is transient in nature, recovers to baseline or to Grade 1 prior to the next dose, no instances are associated with elevated bilirubin or cases of Hy's law; cThrombocytopenia | 19 |
includes preferred terms of platelet count decreased and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia is transient in nature, nadirs at Day 8 and recovers prior to the next dose; dAnaemia includes preferred terms of anaemia and blood loss anaemia; |
Safety Summary of XMT-1536 (UpRi) in Patients with Ovarian Cancer (N = 72)
Dose Modifications | Patients, | |
n (%) | ||
Any dose reduction, | ||
delay, or discontinuation | 22 (31%) | |
due to TRAE | ||
Dose reductions due to | 17 (24%) | |
TRAE | ||
Dose delays due to | 8 (11%) | |
TRAE | ||
Discontinuations due | 5 (7%) | |
to TRAE | ||
SAEs | Patients, | Notes | |
n (%) | |||
SAEs reported in ≥2 (3%) patients | |||
included: | |||
| 5 patients: Gastrointestinal | ||
Any SAEs* | 28 (39%) | obstruction (0 related) | |
4 patients each: Abdominal pain (2 | |||
related), pyrexia (4 related), and | |||
vomiting (3 related) | |||
2 patients each: Cerebrovascular | |||
accident/transient ischemic attack (0 | |||
Treatment- | related), pneumonitis (2 related, | ||
Related | 11 (15%) | Grade 2 and Grade 5**), pneumonia | |
SAEs | (0 related), respiratory failure (0 | ||
related), renal impairment (1 | |||
related), fatigue (1 related), and | |||
atrial fibrillation (0 related) |
* Includes both related and unrelated SAEs as assessed by the Investigator | |
** One grade 5 pneumonitis assessed by the Investigator as related to study drug | 20 |
Abbreviations: SAEs = serious adverse events; TRAE = treatment related adverse event |
Case History of G5 Pneumonitis Case and Program Level Review and Modifications
Heavily Pre-Treated87-Year-Old Patient with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and 4 Prior Lines of Chemotherapy
(carboplatin, paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, niraparib)
Cycle 2 | Initial Presentation: Admitted to Non-Study Hospital | |
• | Moderate weakness, fatigue, dyspnea, and dizziness | |
Day 14 | • | Treated empirically with diuresis |
• | Discharged to home in stable condition with some improvement |
Cycle 2 | Re-admitted |
• Admitted to cancer hospital with severe fatigue, weakness, and dyspnea | |
Day 20 | • Treated empirically with diuresis and antibiotics with transient improvement |
Diagnosed and Treated for Pneumonitis | |
Cycle 2 | • With worsening symptoms, pulmonary consultation suspected pneumonitis |
Day 24 | • Started on corticosteroids, complicated by altered mental status and |
persistent requirement for high-flow oxygen | |
Transitioned to Palliative Care | |
Cycle 2 | • Family concerned respiratory status would not improve |
Day 30 | • Determined patient would not want more aggressive care |
• Patient was transitioned to comfort care only and died 6 days later |
- Safety Review Committee identified a low frequency of pneumonitis cases which were generally low grade and resolved with dose delays, reductions, and/or treatment with steroids
- 8 additional cases out of 145 treated patients
- Grade 1/2 n=7, Grade 3 n=1
- Modifications to protocol
- Enhanced guidance on identification and management of pneumonitis
- Enhanced Dose delay / reduction guidelines
- No further recommendations received from FDA
21
Continued Robust Activity Observed in Heavily-Pretreated Ovarian Cancer
Best Response in Evaluable Patients with Ovarian Cancer (n = 47)
All | Higher | Lower | NaPi2b | |||
NaPi2bO | NaPi2bOO | Not Yet Determined | ||||
(n = 47) | ||||||
(n = 31) | (n = 13) | (n = 3) | ||||
CR; n(%) | 2 | (4) | 2 | (6) | 0 | 0 |
PR; n(%) | 11 (23) | 8 (26) | 2 (15) | 1 (33) | ||
SD; n(%) | 19 | (40) | 13 | (42) | 5 (38) | 1 (33) |
PD; n(%) | 15 | (32) | 8 (26) | 6 (46) | 1 (33) | |
ORR; n (%) | 13 | (28) | 10 | (32) | 2 (15) | 1 (33) |
DCR; n (%) | 32 | (68) | 23 | (74) | 7 (54) | 2 (67) |
All Responses are Confirmed
*25 patients were not evaluable for RECIST response: 10 patients discontinued prior to first scans: 1 clinical progression; 1 related SAE (G5 pneumonitis); 3 unrelated SAEs; 5 withdrew consent; 15 patients did not yet have RECIST assessment as of the data cut
- Higher NaPi2b Expression: defined in dose escalation as at / above lowest H-score at which response observed (≥110) OO Lower NaPi2b Expression: defined in dose escalation as below the lowest H-score at which response observed (<110)
22
Deep Responses Observed in Heavily-Pretreated Ovarian Cancer
Maximum % Change from Baseline in Target Lesions in Patients with Ovarian Cancer (n = 45*)
30/45 (67%) had reductions in target tumor lesions
**
**
- 2 patients not included in waterfall plot as tumor measurement data missing in the database as of data cut; both patients had BOR of PD due to new lesions
- Unconfirmed response, BOR per RECIST v1.1 is SD
- CR of target lesions and non-CR/non-PD of non-target lesions, BOR per RECIST v1.1 is PR
H = Higher NaPi2b Expression; L = Lower NaPi2b Expression; ND = NaPi2b Expression not yet determined or tissue not available
***
23
Responses with XMT-1536 (UpRi) Occur Early and Appear to Deepen Over Time
Change from Baseline in Target Lesions in Patients with Ovarian Cancer (n = 45)
Tumor response observed within 2 cycles in 69% (9 of 13) of Responders
H = Higher NaPi2b Expression; L = Lower NaPi2b Expression; ND = NaPi2b Expression not yet determined or tissue not available
24
Clear Trend to Longer Time on Study with Higher
NaPi2b Expression
Time on XMT-1536 Study in Patients with Ovarian Cancer (n = 72)
Expression | Higher |
NaPi2b | |
Lower | |
ND
Time on Study (Weeks)
25
Abbreviations: CR = complete response; PR = partial response; H = Higher NaPi2b Expression; L = Lower NaPi2b Expression; ND = NaPi2b Expression not yet determined or tissue not available
Median Duration of Response Estimated to be
~5 Months in Patients with Higher NaPi2b Expression
Durability of Response in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Higher NaPi2b (n = 10)
Median Duration of Response: ~5 months
- 2 patients with Lower NaPi2b with DOR of 16.1 and 17.1 weeks, respectively
• 1 patient with NaPi2b ND with DOR 16.1 weeks | 26 |
Conclusions: UpRi (XMT-1536) Expansion in Ovarian Cancer
- In this updated analysis of patients with ovarian cancer, UpRi (XMT-1536) continued to be generally well- tolerated with a consistent profile - no severe neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, or ocular toxicity
- Consistent antitumor activity observed with UpRi (XMT-1536), including patients previously treated with bevacizumab and PARPi
- Complete response observed in 2 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
- Confirmed ORR of 32% and DCR of 74% in higher NaPi2b population
- Median duration of response ~5 months in higher NaPi2b population
- Trend toward higher response rate as well as deeper and more durable responses in patients with higher NaPi2b expression supports the continued development of NaPi2b diagnostic assay
- These data support the continued development of UpRi (XMT-1536) for the treatment of patients with platinum-resistanthigh-grade serous ovarian cancer who have received 1 to 4 prior lines of systemic therapy
27
UpRi (XMT-1536):First-in-Class Dolaflexin
ADC Targeting NaPi2b
Ovarian Cancer Market Dynamics and
UpRi Opportunities
Brian DeSchuytner
SVP Finance & Product Strategy
Early Use of Bevacizumab and PARP Inhibitors is Changing the Ovarian Cancer Landscape
Prior Lines
Surgery +/- Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
• Key approvals moving |
0
1-3
1-4
Frontline Therapy
Platinum
Sensitive
Recurrence
Platinum
Resistant
Recurrence
Platinum
Doublet
Platinum
Doublet
PLD,
Topotecan,
Other Chemo
+/- Bev
+/- Bev
Bev + Single
Agent Chemo
(1 - 2 prior)
+/- PARP
Maintenance
+/- PARP
Maintenance
PARP
(if BRCA and
2 - 3 prior)
+/- Bev PARP Maintenance
PARP
(if BRC/HRD 2 - 3 Prior)
targeted therapy into the | |
frontline | |
- | PAOLA-1 (Bevacizumab + |
Olaparib maintenance vs | |
Bevacizumab) | |
- | PRIMA (niraparib |
maintenance vs placebo) | |
- | GOG-218 (Bevacizumab + |
platinum doublet vs platinum | |
doublet) |
Source: Product Labels, KOL interviews | 29 |
Creating New Unmet Needs and Patient Populations
Prior Lines
0
1-3
1-3
1-4
Frontline Therapy
Platinum
Sensitive
Recurrence
Not
Candidates
for Further
Platinum
Platinum
Resistant
Recurrence
Surgery +/- Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Platinum | +/- Bev | +/- PARP | +/- Bev PARP | |||
Doublet | Maintenance | Maintenance | ||||
Platinum | +/- PARP | PARP | ||||
+/- Bev | (if BRCA/HRD | |||||
Doublet | Maintenance | |||||
2 - 3 Prior) | ||||||
PLD, | ||||||
Topotecan, | ||||||
Other Chemo | ||||||
PLD, | Bev + Single | PARP | ||||
Topotecan, | Agent Chemo | (if BRCA and | ||||
Other Chemo | (1 - 2 prior) | 2 - 3 prior) |
Unmet Needs
- With emerging evidence of poor outcomes with platinum following relapse after PARPi maintenance, non-platinum combos needed
- Better tolerated, more effective platinum combinations
- Agents with activity following platinum, PARP, and bevacizumab and exceeding 4-12% ORR of single agent chemo
Source: Product Labels, KOL interviews | 30 |
And Opportunities to Evaluate UpRi in Practice Changing Clinical Studies
Prior Lines
Frontline
0 Therapy
Platinum
1-3 Sensitive
Recurrence
Not
Candidates
1-3 for Further Platinum
Surgery +/- Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Platinum | +/- Bev | +/- PARP | +/- Bev PARP | |||
Doublet | Maintenance | Maintenance | ||||
Platinum | +/- PARP | PARP | ||||
+/- Bev | (if BRCA/HRD | |||||
Doublet | Maintenance | |||||
2 - 3 Prior) | ||||||
PLD,
Topotecan,
Other Chemo
Platinum Maintenance Combo
Non-PlatinumCombo
1-4 | Platinum | PLD, | Bev + Single | PARP |
Resistant | Topotecan, | Agent Chemo | (if BRCA and | |
Recurrence | Other Chemo | (1 - 2 prior) | 2 - 3 prior) |
UPLIFT
Source: Product Labels, KOL interviews | 31 |
UpRi Profile May Offer Potential Advantages in Combination
Adverse Events Observed in >30% of Patients Treated with Lifastuzumab Vedotin 2.4 mg/kg + Carboplatin (N=20)
Neutropenia | 50% | G3+ | ||||||||||
Thrombocytopenia | ||||||||||||
Fatigue | ||||||||||||
Anemia | ||||||||||||
Peripheral Neuropathy | 55% All | Grade | ||||||||||
Hypomagnesemia | ||||||||||||
Vomiting | ||||||||||||
Nausea | ||||||||||||
AST Increased | ||||||||||||
Grade 3+ | ||||||||||||
Constipation | All Grades | |||||||||||
0 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | |||||||
Percentage of Patients |
- Roche's lifastuzumab vedotin demonstrated significant overlapping toxicities in combination with platinum
- To date, UpRi has demonstrated activity without severe neutropenia, neuropathy, or ocular toxicity
- Platinum doublets remain the backbone of ovarian cancer therapy in earlier lines, but tolerability limits platinum treatment duration
Moore, K. et al Gynecologic Oncology (2020) | 32 |
UpRi (XMT-1536): An Opportunity to Deliver a Potentially Foundational Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Earlier Lines of Therapy | |||||||
Treatment and | |||||||
Maintenance Options | |||||||
New Combinations | under Evaluation | ||||||
Single-Arm Registration | UPGRADE | ||||||
Umbrella Combo Starting | |||||||
Strategy in Platinum Resistant | |||||||
with Platinum | |||||||
Disease | Additional Combinations | ||||||
under Consideration | |||||||
UPLIFT | |||||||
INCREASING MARKET POTENTIAL | . |
33
XMT-1660:First-in-ClassB7-H4 ADC
Timothy B. Lowinger, PhD
Chief Science & Technology Officer
B7-H4 Expression Well-Suited for a DolaLock ADC
TUMOR CELL
CATABOLIZES ADC
B7-H4
B7-H4 |
B7-H4 |
TUMOR |
KILLING |
IMMUNOGENIC |
CELL DEATH (ICD) |
- B7-H4is selectively expressed on tumor cells in multiple indications
- Limited expression in normal tissues
B7-H4
- A DolaLock ADC targeting B7-H4 has the potential to exert its effect through multiple mechanisms of action:
Immune | AF-HPA |
Diffusion | |
Response | |
Bystander | |
Effect | |
T CELL | ICD |
PRIMING |
TUMOR
KILLING
DENDRITIC CELL
ACTIVATION BY AF-HPA
Tumor Microenvironment
TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGE CATABOLIZES ADC
BYSTANDER
KILLING
- Uptake by tumor cells and direct cytotoxicity
- Released payload can also diffuse to antigen negative tumor cells via the DolaLock controlled bystander effect
- Tumor cell killing results in immunogenic cell death, and the DolaLock payload activates dendritic cells
- The DolaLock ADC can provide a combined cytotoxic and immune-basedanti-tumor effect
- B7-H4is also expressed on tumor-associated macrophages which can potentially further contribute to the effect
"The Perfect Storm" | 35 |
Our DolaLock Payload is Both Cytotoxic and Immunostimulatory
AF-HPA induces immunogenic cell death
AF-HPA activates dendritic cells
Calreticulin surface translocation
AF-HPA | |
(payload) | Dolaflexin ADC |
Calreticulin
Control
2.5 hr treatment at1 uM
Calreticulin Calreticulin/Membrane/DNA
Untreated
Dolaflexin ADC 24 hr at 1 uM
ATP release
nM | 35 |
30 | |
ATP | 25 |
Concentration | 20 |
15 | |
10 | |
5 | |
0 |
LPS (positive control) DMSO (negative control) Dolastatin-10 @ 100 nM AF-HPA @ 100 nM
20 hr treatment of murine BMDC
ICD induction consistent with: | Dendritic cell activation consistent with: | 36 |
Cao et al. 2016; Gardai et al. 2015; Rios-Doriaet al. 2017 | Martin et al. 2014; Mueller et al. 2014; Mueller et al. 2015 |
B7-H4 is Expressed in Multiple Cancer Indications with High Unmet Medical Need
B7H4 mRNA Expression RSEM log 2
Based on mRNA expression data (cBioPortal), high expression in:
- Bile duct carcinoma
- Ovarian
- Uterine
- Breast
- Pancreatic
- Lung squamous
- Bladder
- Etc.
Protein expression data:
• 2-3+ IHC B7-H4 staining/H>50 in >50% of samples in TNBC, uterine, ovarian cancer (Sachdev et al. ASCO, 2019) n= not stated
• B7-H4 Expression (aggregate 1-3+ immunoreactivity) in 77%TNBC, and ~60% HER2+ and HR+ (Leong et al., 2015) n=202
• B7-H4 Expression "High" in ~ 45% of Breast Cancers (Altan et al., 2018) (two cohorts n=561, 444)
• B7-H4 Expression detected in 12.8 and 22.6 % of NSCLC (two cohorts), with higher frequency in SCC (Schalper et al., 2017)
37
Targeting B7-H4 Creates Opportunities to Potentially Address Patients Poorly Served by Checkpoint Inhibitors
PD-L1B7-H4
PD-L1 and B7-H4 expression are essentially mutually exclusive
Case 1
• No co-expression in >95% of breast
cancer and lung cancer samples*
Case 2
Breast Cancer Examples
*Altan et al. 2018 Breast Cancer; Schalper et al. 2016 Clin.Canc.Res. | 38 |
XMT-1660 Selected Candidate Based on Direct Comparison Across Multiple In Vivo Models, including PDX Models
MX-1 TNBC Model | Patient-derived TNBC Model |
Solid lines indicate equivalent dose by payload; dashed line = 0.5x dose
Non-binding control ADCs and unconjugated B7-H4 mAb were all inactive; data omitted for clarity XMT-1660
site specific | stochastic | site specific | |||||||||||
Dolasynthen DAR 2 | Dolaflexin DAR 12 | Dolasynthen DAR 6 | 39 | ||||||||||
Preclinical Profile of XMT-1660 Supports Advancement
- Pharmacokinetic profile displays long half life (~5 days in NHPs) and dose- dependent exposure
- Highly stable with very low (<0.1%) free payload detected in circulation
- Well tolerated in NHPs after multiple doses
- Demonstrated therapeutic index based on well-tolerated exposure in NHPs and efficacious exposures in mouse
40
Summary of the Opportunity
- Potential first-in-class opportunity with compelling target biology and unique fit to DolaLock payload
- Clinical candidate was optimized on multiple parameters
- DAR, site specific bioconjugation, selection of optimal antibody
- Dolasynthen DAR-6 consistently outperformed stochastic Dolaflexin DAR-12 and site specific Dolasynthen DAR-2 across multiple tumor models
- Expression in areas of high unmet medical need: TNBC, ER+ BC, Endometrial cancer and others
- Opportunity for accelerated development path in key indications of interest
- Expected to enter the clinic in Q1 2022
41
Corporate Update
Anna Protopapas
President & CEO
UpRi (XMT-1536): Compelling Efficacy and Tolerability Data with Broad Potential in Ovarian Cancer
>30% ORR with CRs in
Ovarian Cancer Patients with Higher NaPi2b Expression
- Majority of patients pre-treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab; 35% with 4 or more prior lines
- Complete response observed in 2 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
- ORR of 32% and DCR of 74% in patients with higher NaPi2b expression
- Median duration of response: 5 months in higher NaPi2b Population
- Biomarker selects for enhanced outcomes, but responses and stable disease observed in lower NaPi2b population as well
No Severe Neutropenia, Ocular
Toxicity, or Peripheral
Neuropathy
- Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were generally Grade 1-2 fatigue, nausea, transient AST elevation without associated changes in bilirubin or cases of Hy's law, transient thrombocytopenia
- Enhanced dose modification and management guidelines for pneumonitis
Single-Arm Registration Strategy
and Expansion Potential in
Combos and Earlier Lines
- UPLIFT includes key differentiators
- Leverages expansion cohort momentum and no biomarker pre-selection for enrollment speed
- Broad population up to 4 prior lines, with no prior bevacizumab required for 3 - 4 prior lines
- Assay validation strategy
- UPGRADE umbrella combination study, with initial platinum cohort, informs strategy in earlier lines
Data as of December 3,2020. Complete ESMO 2020 disclosure available here:https://www.mersana.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Mersana_ESMO-2020_Poster_FINAL.pdf
Complete ASCO 2020 disclosure available here:https://www.mersana.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2020-ASCO_XMT-1536_Poster_FINAL-14May2020.pdf
43
UpRi (XMT-1536): An Opportunity to Deliver a Potentially Foundational Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Earlier Lines of Therapy | |||||||
Treatment and | |||||||
Maintenance Options | |||||||
New Combinations | under Evaluation | ||||||
Single-Arm Registration | UPGRADE | ||||||
Umbrella Combo Starting | |||||||
Strategy in Platinum Resistant | |||||||
with Platinum | |||||||
Disease | Additional Combinations | ||||||
under Consideration | |||||||
UPLIFT | |||||||
INCREASING MARKET POTENTIAL | . |
44
Goals and Anticipated Milestones for 2021
Upifitamab | • Q1 2021: Initiate UPLIFT single-arm registration strategy as amendment | |
Rilsodotin | • Q3 2021: Initiate UPGRADE combination dose escalation umbrella study | |
UpRi | ||
(XMT-1536) | • 2H 2021: Report updated interim data from NSCLC expansion cohort | |
XMT-1592 | • 2H 2021: Report dose escalation data | |
• Q4 | 2021: Outline further development path | |
XMT-1660 | • Q4 | 2021: Complete IND-enabling studies to initiate Phase I dose escalation in 2022 |
XMT-2056 | • Q4 | 2021: Complete IND-enabling studies to initiate Phase I dose escalation in 2022 |
• Q4 | 2021: Disclose target | |
Corporate | • Continue to leverage proprietary platforms to expand pipeline | |
• Proactively evaluate potential for collaborations that maximize value | ||
45
We are Leveraging our Novel ADC Platforms to Generate Differentiated Product Candidates
P1 Dose | P1 Proof | P2/Pivotal | ||||||
ADC Program | Target | Indication | Platform | Discovery | Preclinical | Escalation | of Concept | |
XMT-1536* | NaPi2b | Ovarian Cancer | Dolaflexin | |||||
NSCLC Adenocarcinoma | Dolaflexin | |||||||
XMT-1592* | NaPi2b | Ovarian Cancer | Dolasynthen | |||||
NSCLC Adenocarcinoma | ||||||||
XMT-1660 | B7-H4 | Multiple Solid Tumors | Dolasynthen | |||||
XMT-2056 | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Immunosynthen | |||||
Multiple Programs | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Immunosynthen | |||||
Multiple Programs | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Dolasynthen or | |||||
Dolaflexin | ||||||||
Multiple | Multiple | Undisclosed | Dolaflexin | |||||
ASN004 | 5T4 | Undisclosed | Dolaflexin |
*NaPi2b antibody used in XMT-1536 and XMT-1592 is in-licensed from Recepta Biopharma. Recepta has rights to commercialize XMT-1536 and XMT-1592 in Brazil
46
We are Leveraging our Novel ADC Platforms to Generate Differentiated Product Candidates
Anticipated Pipeline Progress in 2021
P1 Dose | P1 Proof | P2/Pivotal | ||||||
ADC Program | Target | Indication | Platform | Discovery | Preclinical | Escalation | of Concept | |
XMT-1536* | NaPi2b | Ovarian Cancer | Dolaflexin | |||||
NSCLC Adenocarcinoma | Dolaflexin | |||||||
XMT-1592* | NaPi2b | Ovarian Cancer | Dolasynthen | |||||
NSCLC Adenocarcinoma | ||||||||
XMT-1660 | B7-H4 | Multiple Solid Tumors | Dolasynthen | |||||
XMT-2056 | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Immunosynthen | |||||
Multiple Programs | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Immunosynthen | |||||
Multiple Programs | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Dolasynthen or | |||||
Dolaflexin | ||||||||
Multiple | Multiple | Undisclosed | Dolaflexin | |||||
ASN004 | 5T4 | Undisclosed | Dolaflexin |
*NaPi2b antibody used in XMT-1536 and XMT-1592 is in-licensed from Recepta Biopharma. Recepta has rights to commercialize XMT-1536 and XMT-1592 in Brazil
47
Question & Answer Session
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Mersana Therapeutics Inc. published this content on 05 January 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 08 January 2021 21:39:06 UTC