Overview

LegacyXchange, Inc., formerly known as True 2 Beauty, Inc. (the "Company") was originally incorporated as Burrow Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on December 11, 2006. In February 2010, the Company shifted its focus to the beauty industry and later amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to True 2 Beauty, Inc.

On July 10, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary True2Bid, Inc. ("True2Bid") which was incorporated in the state of Nevada. This subsidiary's name was changed to LegacyXchange, Inc. ("LegacyXchange") in December 2014. The Company continued to sell existing inventory of beauty products through May 2013 when the final inventory was sold. LegacyXchange operates an online e-commerce platform focused on delivering users a wide array of sports and entertainment related products that can be won in an action-packed environment of a live auction. The Company is currently inactive and is seeking other business opportunities.

The Company's articles authorize the Company to issue 190,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both at a par value of $0.001 per share.

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and is based primarily on the comparative unaudited financial statements, footnotes and related information for the periods identified and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this report.





                         For the Three Months Ended
                                  June 30,
                            2016               2015
Loss from operations   $     (117,631 )     $ (159,848 )
Other income, net             459,704           93,541
Net income (loss)      $      342,073       $  (66,307 )




Revenue:


We did not generate any revenues from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.





Operating expenses:



For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, operating expenses amounted to $117,631 and $159,848, respectively, a decrease of $42,217 or 26%. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, operating expenses consisted of the following:





                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                                       June 30,
                                                 2016               2015
Compensation and related taxes              $       31,036       $   33,971
Professional and consulting fees                    77,107          110,599
Other selling, general and administrative            9,488           15,278
Total                                       $      117,631       $  159,848

? Compensation and related taxes:

For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, compensation and related taxes amounted to $31,036 and $33,971, respectively, a decrease of $2,935 or 9%. The decrease was primarily due to reduction in executive compensation.

? Professional and consulting fees:

For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, professional and consulting fees amounted to $77,107 and $110,599, respectively, a decrease of $33,492 or 30%. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduce in operational activities in 2016 compared to 2015.





                                       14




? Other selling, general and administrative:

For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, other selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $9,488 and $15,278, respectively, a decrease of $5,790, or 38%. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduce in operational activities in 2016 compared to 2015.





Loss from operations:


For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, loss from operations amounted to $117,631 and $159,848, respectively, a decrease of $42,217, or 26%. The change was a result of the changes in operating expenses as discussed above.





Other income (expense):


Other income (expense) includes interest expense, initial derivative expense and gains from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, total other income, net, amounted to $459,704 as compared to $93,541 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $366,163 or 391%. The increase was attributable to an increase in the gain from change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $257,501 or 99%, decrease in initial derivative expense of $119,455, or 100%, for a total increase in other income of $376,956 offset by an increase in interest expense of $10,793, or 23%.





Net income (loss):



For the three months ended June 30, 2016, net income amounted to $342,073, or net income per common share of $0.01 basic and $(0.00) diluted as compared to $(66,307) net (loss), or net (loss) per common share of $(0.00) (basic and diluted) for the three months ended June 30, 2015, a change of $408,380, or 616%. The change was a result of the changes in operating expenses and other income (expense) as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. We had a working capital deficit of $958,818 and $0 of cash as of June 30, 2016 and working capital deficit of $1,300,891 and $4,209 of cash as of March 31, 2016.





                                                                  Three Months Ended
                                                                     June 30, 2016
                             June 30,       March 31,                           Percentage
                               2016            2016            Change             Change
Working capital deficit:
Total current assets        $    1,250     $     65,826     $     (64,576 )              98 %
Total current liabilities     (960,068 )     (1,366,717 )         406,649                30 %
Working capital deficit:    $ (958,818 )   $ (1,300,891 )   $     342,073                26 %



The decrease in working capital deficit was primarily attributable to a decrease in current assets of $64,576 and a decrease in current liabilities of $406,649.





Cash Flow


A summary of cash flow activities is summarized as follows:





                                           Three Months Ended
                                                June 30,
                                          2016           2015

Cash used in operating activities $ (15,364 ) $ (117,436 ) Cash provided by financing activities 11,155 115,000 Net decrease in cash

$  (4,209 )   $   (2,436 )

Net cash used in operating activities:

Net cash flow used in operating activities was $15,364 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $117,436 for three months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $102,072 or 87%.





                                       15




? Net cash flow used in operating activities for the three months ended June 30,

2016 primarily reflected our net income of $342,073 adjusted for the add-back

on non-cash items such as amortization of debt discount of $41,572, gain from

change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $517,001, write-off of

obsolete inventory of $570, amortization of prepaid consulting fees of $9,797

and the changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily consisting of a

decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $50,000, an increase

in accounts payable of $22,369 and an increase in accrued liabilities of

$35,256.



? Net cash flow used in operating activities for three months ended June 30, 2015

primarily reflected our net loss $66,307 adjusted for the add-back on non-cash

items such stock-based compensation of $14,045, amortization of debt discount

of $35,122, initial fair value expense of derivative liabilities of $119,455,

gain from change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $259,500,

amortization of prepaid consulting fees of $11,355 and the changes in operating

assets and liabilities primarily consisting of an increase in prepaid expenses

and current assets of $9,470, an increase in accounts payable $41,664 offset by

a decrease in accrued liabilities of $3,800.

Cash provided by financing activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $11,155 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $115,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $103,845 or 90%.

? Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended June 30,

2016 consisted of $11,155 of net proceeds from loan payables.

? Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended June 30,

2015 consisted of $115,000 of net proceeds from convertible notes, net of


   issuance cost.




Cash Requirements


Our management does not believe that our current capital resources will be adequate to continue operating our company and maintaining our business strategy for more than 12 months from the date of this report. Accordingly, we will have to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.





Going Concern


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in our accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had net income and net cash used in operating activities of $342,073 and $15,364, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The net income was primarily attributed to the gain from the change in far value of derivative liabilities. The Company had accumulated deficit, stockholders' deficit and working capital deficit of $10,203,964, $958,818 and $958,818, respectively, at June 30, 2016. The Company had no revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2016, and we defaulted on our loans. Management believes that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months from the issuance date of this report.

Management cannot provide assurance that we will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Management believes that our capital resources are not currently adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business strategy for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of this report. The Company will seek to raise capital through additional debt and/or equity financings to fund its operations in the future.

Although the Company has historically raised capital from sales of equity and from the issuance of promissory notes, there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional lending in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail or cease operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Common Stock for Debt Conversion

During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the lenders did not convert any of the outstanding convertible notes.





                                       16




Sales of Common Stock Pursuant to Subscription Agreements

During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no sales of common stock.





Future Financings



We will require additional financing to fund our planned operations. We currently do not have committed sources of additional financing and may not be able to obtain additional financing particularly, if the volatile conditions of the stock and financial markets persist.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to further delay or further scale down some or all of our activities or perhaps even cease the operations of the business.

Since inception we have funded our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and we expect that we will continue to fund our operations through the equity and debt financing. If we are able to raise additional financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders' ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial or other loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on his, her, or its investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business and results of operations. Our reported results are impacted by the application of the following accounting policies, certain of which require management to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact quarterly or annual results of operations. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.





Use of Estimates


The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates during the three months ended June 30, 2016 include assumptions used in valuation of derivative liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to the Company on June 30, 2016. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:





  Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
  assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

  Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
  in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
  liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
  that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable
  market data.

  Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity's own
  assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing
  the asset or liability based on the best available information.




                                       17




The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, due from and to related parties, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.





Derivative Liabilities



The Company has certain financial instruments that are embedded derivatives associated with capital raises and certain warrants. The Company evaluates all its financial instruments to determine if those contracts or any potential embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-10 - Derivative and Hedging - Contract in Entity's Own Equity. This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any derivatives be recorded at fair value at issuance and marked-to-market at each balance sheet date. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded as either other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or repayment, the respective derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion, repayment or exercise date and then the related fair value amount is reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

In July 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features. These amendments simplify the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features. The amendments require companies to disregard the down-round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.





Revenue Recognition


In May 2014, FASB issued an update Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2014-09, establishing ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures. adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the process for, timing of, and presentation and disclosure of revenue recognition from customers. The Company did not have revenues from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016.





Stock-Based Compensation


Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2014-12). The guidance applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. For all entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The Company early adopted ASU 2014-12 during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 did not have any material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.





                                       18




Pursuant to ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, all share-based payments to non-employees, including grants of stock options, were recognized in the consolidated financial statements as compensation expense over the service period of the consulting arrangement or until performance conditions are expected to be met. Using a Black Scholes valuation model, the Company periodically reassessed the fair value of non-employee options until service conditions are met, which generally aligns with the vesting period of the options, and the Company adjusts the expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements accordingly. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of the stock-based compensation guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU No. 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but entities may not adopt prior to adopting the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). The guidance in ASU 2014-15 sets forth management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern as well as required disclosures. ASU 2014-15 indicates that, when preparing financial statements for interim and annual financial statements, management should evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This evaluation should include consideration of conditions and events that are either known or are reasonably knowable at the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, as well as whether it is probable that management's plans to address the substantial doubt will be implemented and, if so, whether it is probable that the plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2014-15 during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 did not have any material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13-Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe this will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.





                                       19

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses