General

We were incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada in 1984. In 2004, we changed our corporate jurisdiction from a British Columbia company to a Canadian corporation. In December 2011, we amended our articles to change our name from "i-minerals inc." to "I-Minerals Inc."

The Company is engaged in the exploration, evaluation and development of our Helmer-Bovill industrial minerals property (the "Helmer-Bovill Property"). The Helmer-Bovill Property, in which we hold a 100% interest, is comprised of 11 mineral leases totaling 5,140.64 acres located approximately 6 miles northwest of Bovill, Latah County, Idaho. Since inception, the Company has been in the exploration stage but moved into the development stage in fiscal 2018. In fiscal 2019, the Company reverted back to the evaluation stage.

Our principal executive office is located at Suite 880, 580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and our telephone number is (877) 303-6573. Our operations office is located at 13403 N. Government Way, #102, Hayden, Idaho.

To date, we have not earned significant revenues from the operation of our Helmer-Bovill Property. Accordingly, we are dependent on debt and equity financing as our primary source of operating working capital. Our capital resources are largely determined by the strength of the junior resource markets and by the status of our projects in relation to these markets, and its ability to compete for investor support of its projects.





Our Principal Projects


Our activities at the Helmer-Bovill Property are focused on developing the Bovill Project.

The Bovill Project

Our lead project, the Bovill Project, is a strategically located long term resource of quartz, potassium feldspar ("K-spar"), halloysite and kaolinite formed through weathering of a border phase of the Idaho Batholith causing all minerals to be contained within a fine white clay-sand mixture referred to as "primary clay." The Bovill Project is located within 3 miles of state highways with electricity and natural gas already at the property boundary.

Since 2010, our exploration work has focused diamond drilling on the Bovill Project. To date, a total of 322 diamond drill holes have been drilled totaling 35,909 feet. As a result of these drill campaigns, four deposits have been identified: Kelly's Hump, Kelly's Hump South, Middle Ridge and WBL.

In June 2014, we completed an updated pre-feasibility study on the Bovill Kaolin Project (the "2014 PFS") and on March 8, 2016, we announced the economic results of our initial feasibility study (the "2016 FS"). However, based on the results of an updated independent market study it is apparent that fundamental changes in the businesses that consume our minerals has taken place over the past several years. These changes include offshoring and reformulation wherein industries that had previously used K-spar for example have reformulated their production batches using alternate minerals. Markets do exist for all of the minerals contained within the Bovill Kaolin Project but not in the volumes contemplated in the 2016 FS. Accordingly, the 2016 FS is considered not to be current and should not be relied upon.

The mineral resources stated in the 2016 FS remain current and have recently been re-stated in a standalone technical report prepared by SRK Consulting (U.S.) recently completed an updated resource estimate. The updated mineral resource statement from this report, summarized below, contains the same tonnages and grades as were disclosed in the 2016 FS and is the basis of the reserves defined in the 2020 Pre-Feasibility Report.



                                       18

2020 Pre-Feasibility Study


The Company engaged MillCreek Engineering of Salt Lake City, Utah to estimate the capital and operating costs for a smaller plant capable of producing up to 20,000 tons of metakaolin and 10,000 tons of halloysite per year. The estimated Operating Costs and Capital Cost fell in line with expectations and the Company retained MillCreek to complete a Pre-Feasibility Study of a metakaolin and halloysite operation. It is envisioned that the sand fraction (K-spar and quartz) will be screened and sold into lower value industrial applications.

On March 3, 2020, we announced a pre-feasibility study of our metakaolin and halloysite operation (the "2020 PFS"). The 2020 PFS was led by Millcreek Engineering, who were responsible for overall project management and the process plant and infrastructure design (including OPEX and CAPEX) and economic analyses. Other engineering and geological services were provided by Mine Development Associates (mine modelling; ore scheduling; mineral reserve estimation); SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc. (mineral resource estimation); and, HDR Engineering Inc. (environmental review).

Highlights of the PFS include:





  • 20% Pre-Tax IRR; 18% After Tax IRR
  • US$48.3 million Pre-Tax NPV; US$33.7 million After Tax NPV
  • Initial Capital Cost of US$48.3 million
  • Total Life of Operation Capital Costs of US$54.2 million
  • 25 year mine life with 1.04:1 strip ratio



The 2020 PFS is based on the production of two minerals, halloysite and kaolinite. The halloysite is beneficiated into two mineral products; HalloPure which is about 70% halloysite and 30% kaolinite and premium quality Ultra-Hallopure which is greater than 90% halloysite with the balance kaolinite. The quality of Bovill Halloysite is regarded as being exceptional and the research on halloysite applications has dramatically increased over the past 5 years involving polymers, filtration, extruded polystyrene insulation, green technology and life sciences. The kaolinite is flash calcined to produce metakaolin, a Supplementary Cementitious Material ("SCM") and highly reactive pozzolan that when added to concrete increases strength and durability, reduces permeability, reduces the effect of alkali-silica reactivity and increases resistance to chloride ingress and sulfate attack. By using metakaolin the sustainability of the concrete is increased through longer service life and the carbon footprint is reduced by lowering the quantity of Portland cement. Feldspathic sand is produced during the production process which meets the specifications of a number of applications including arena sand, USGA bunker and top-dressing sand. There is a potential upside from sale of feldspathic sand which is not included in the project economics and accordingly the feldspathic sand is not included in the reserves.

A conservative approach to the build-up of sales has been assumed with full production being achieved in the first quarter of the 5th year of operation as some product applications will require development. There is potential for full production to be achieved earlier which would have a corresponding positive effect on the NPV and IRR.

Updated Measured and Indicated Resource Estimate





  •   Measured Resources of 5.7 million tons containing 76.5% quartz/K-spar sand,
      12.3% Kaolinite and 4.0% Halloysite.
  •   Indicated Resources of 15.5 million tons containing 57.0% quartz/K-spar
      sand, 15.5% Kaolinite and 2.8% Halloysite.
  •   667,000 tons of contained halloysite, 3,119,000 tons of contained kaolinite
      and 13,235,000 tons of contained quartz/K-spar.


                                       19

Updated Mineral Reserves

                    Proven      Probable       Total P&P
           K Tons       1,310         1,868           3,178
     Halloysite %         8.8           8.0             8.3
Halloysite K Tons         115           149             264
      Kaolinite %        11.1          22.4            17.7
 Kaolinite K Tons         145           418             563
              NSR $       109 $         123 $           117



* Notes on Mineral Reserves:

• Reserves are based on a $40.00 NSR cutoff grade and pit designs.

• Rounding of numbers in mineral reserves listed above may cause apparent

inconsistencies.


  •   The reference point for Mineral Reserves is at the plant stockpile



The full 2020 PFS was filed on www.sedar.com on April 16, 2020 and is available on the Company's website.

Plan of Operation and Outlook

The Company is continuing to take a sequential approach to the development of the Bovill Project. The Idaho Department of Lands granted the amended Operations and Reclamation Plan on December 18, 2020. Going forward we intend to initiate a Feasibility Study and a Front End Engineering Design Study.

During 2021 I-Minerals developed a solid market for feldspathic sand. The developed markets include bunker sand and top dressing for golf course along with equestrian sand. In addition, I-Minerals will be looking to expand the feldspathic sand market to include the tile industry and mortar sand.

Market development for halloysite is ongoing with cutting edge research in epoxy coatings and new developments in wound care. South Korea has received a substantial amount of I-Minerals halloysite to test in various applications and remains to have strong interest.

I-Minerals' mineral tenure is through the Idaho Department of Lands ("IDL") mineral leases. The IDL recently amended terms on newly granted mineral leases with terms including an increase in the term of the leases to 20 years from the current leases term of 10 years and, upon commencement of commercial production on one lease, other leases can be held through mine development or exploration work. In contrast, historical leases could only be held by production on the leases from which production occurred. The historical lease terms would mean that leases that held resources, but from which production had not yet occurred, would lapse at end of the 10-year term.

Given the Company's mineral leases were set to expire on February 28, 2023, the Company approached the IDL with a request to amend the terms of the mineral leases to reflect the terms currently being offered on newly issued mineral leases. The IDL declined the request on the basis that the proposed amendments constituted material changes and material changes would require the leases be put to auction.

Rather than pursue the lease amendment process that would only result in an additional 10 year term on the mineral leases, the Company elected to apply for new mineral leases. In accordance with IDL procedures the availability of the leases was advertised for 30 days. With no competing bidders forthcoming, in March 2022 the Company secured the 8 new minerals leases that host the reserves, water supply and infrastructure, such leases now expiring in March 2042. The Company has elected to relinquish 3 additional mineral leases for which it believes the geological potential to support economic deposits of kaolinite and halloysite is very limited.

The ORP, FS and FEED Study is forecasted to take a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 12 months to complete. Estimated costs to complete is estimated as follows:





Feasibility Study and FEED Study   $     885,000
Mineral Marketing                        420,000
General and administrative               650,000
Sub total                              1,955,000
Contingency                              105,000
Total                             $   2,060,000


                                       20

Results of Operations


Three months ended January 31, 2022 and 2021

We recorded a net loss of $299,726 ($0.00 per share) for the three months ended January 31, 2022 as compared to a net loss of $1,271,789 ($0.01 per share) for the three months ended January 31, 2021. The decrease in the net loss recorded for the three months ended January 31, 20222 as compared to the net loss for the three months ended January 31, 2021 is the net result of changes to a number of expenses. Of note are the following items:

• Management and consulting fees of $50,663 (2021 - $51,282) are comprised of


    fees to manage our Company and stock-based compensation.  The stock-based
    compensation recognized in the current period was $nil (2021 - $nil).
    Approximately 75% of the fees to manage our Company are charged to management
    and consulting fees and the other 25% is charged to mineral property
    expenditures.

• Mineral property expenditures of $150,828 (2021 - $168,638) are costs


    incurred on our Helmer-Bovill Property.  The expenditures in the current
    period are pre-development costs that have been expensed during the period.
    The main components of costs during the current period included engineering
    and consulting ($56,057) and metallurgy ($30,788).  During the current
    period, the Company continued to optimize the metallurgical processes and
    detailed engineering.  Effective January 31, 2019, the Company returned to
    the evaluation stage for accounting purposes and therefore stopped
    capitalizing development costs.

• General and miscellaneous expenses of $45,375 (2021 - $57,315) are comprised


    of office and telephone expenses, payroll taxes, medical benefits, insurance
    premiums, travel expenses, promotional expenses, shareholder communication
    fees, transfer agent fees and filing fees.  The decrease during the current
    period was due primarily to a decrease in investor relations and filing and
    transfer agent fees.
•   Professional fees of $41,514 (2021 - $30,341) include legal fees, audit fees

and financial consulting fees. The increase during the period was due to


    additional professional tax fees.
•   Interest expense of $11,247 (2021 - $962,104) is from promissory notes that
    bear interest at the rates of 12%-14% per year up to April 30, 2021 and 0.13%
    per year effective May 1, 2021.  Interest decreased due to the decrease in
    interest rate.



Nine months ended January 31, 2022 and 2021

We recorded a net loss of $1,024,963 ($0.01 per share) for the nine months ended January 31, 2022 as compared to a net loss of $3,659,485 ($0.04 per share) for the nine months ended January 31, 2021. The decrease in the net loss recorded for the nine months ended January 31, 2022 as compared to the net loss for the nine months ended January 31, 2021 is the net result of changes to a number of expenses. Of note are the following items:

• Management and consulting fees of $152,329 (2021 - $151,806) are comprised of


  fees to manage our Company and stock-based compensation.  The stock-based
  compensation recognized in the current period was $nil (2021 - $nil).
  Approximately 75% of the fees to manage our Company are charged to management
  and consulting fees and the other 25% is charged to mineral property
  expenditures.

• Mineral property expenditures of $435,478 (2021 - $467,099) are costs incurred


  on our Helmer-Bovill Property.  The expenditures in the current period are
  pre-development costs that have been expensed during the period.  The main
  components of costs during the current period included engineering and
  consulting ($116,057) and metallurgy ($142,695).  During the current period,
  the Company continued to optimize the metallurgical processes and detailed
  engineering.  Effective January 31, 2019, the Company returned to the
  evaluation stage for accounting purposes and therefore stopped capitalizing
  development costs.
• General and miscellaneous expenses of $153,539 (2021 - $145,985) are comprised

of office and telephone expenses, payroll taxes, medical benefits, insurance

premiums, travel expenses, promotional expenses, shareholder communication

fees, transfer agent fees and filing fees. The increase during the current

period was due primarily to an increase in insurance. • Professional fees of $189,295 (2021 - $127,792) include legal fees, audit fees

and financial consulting fees. The increase during the period was due to


  additional professional tax fees.
• Interest expense of $93,107 (2021 - $2,765,757) is from promissory notes that
  bear interest at the rates of 12%-14% per year up to April 30, 2021 and 0.13%
  per year effective May 1, 2021.  Interest decreased due to the decrease in
  interest rate, offset by recognizing $60,000 of interest expense due to the
  Canada Revenue Agency relating to the withholding tax payable.


                                       21

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our aggregate operating, investing and financing activities during the nine months ended January 31, 2022 resulted in a net cash outflow of $64,270 (2021 - outflow of $153,213). As at January 31, 2022, we had a working capital deficiency of $35,787,983.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2022, $914,270 was used in operations (2021 - $902,334). During the nine months ended January 31, 2022, we spent $nil on investing activities (2021 - $879) and we received $850,000 from financing activities (2021 - $750,000).

We have been financed by advances pursuant to promissory notes advanced by BV Lending LLC, an entity controlled by Allen L. Ball, a member of our Board of Directors and our largest shareholder (the "Lender"). During the nine months ended January 31, 2022, the Company was receiving advances pursuant to the Sixth Promissory Notes. As at January 31, 2022, the balance of the promissory notes was $34,526,937. Subsequent to January 31, 2022, the Company received $250,000 pursuant to the Sixth Promissory Notes.

As at July 31, 2020, the Third Promissory Notes, the Fifth Promissory Notes and the Sixth Promissory Notes had a maturity date of the earlier of (i) June 30, 2020 and (ii) 60 days after a pre-feasibility study has been filed on SEDAR. On June 4, 2020, the promissory notes maturity date was extended from June 30, 2020 to December 15, 2020 for no consideration. All other terms remained the same. On December 3, 2020, the Lender agreed to extend the maturity date of the promissory notes to March 15, 2021 for no consideration. On March 9, 2021, the Lender agreed to extend the maturity date to April 15, 2021 for no consideration. On April 15, 2021 the maturity date was extended to May 15, 2021 for no consideration. On May 10, 2021 the maturity date was extended to June 15, 2021 for no consideration. On June 15, 2021 the maturity date was extended to July 15, 2021 for no consideration. On July 15, 2021 the maturity date was extended to August 15, 2021. In addition, the interest rate was decreased to 0.13% per annum effective May 1, 2021 for no consideration. On August 12, 2021, the maturity date was extended to September 15, 2021 for no consideration. On September 13, 2021, the maturity date was extended to October 15, 2021 for no consideration. On October 13, 2021, the maturity date was extended to November 15, 2021 for no consideration. On November 15, 2021, the maturity date was extended to December 15, 2021 for no consideration and the Lender agreed to advance an additional $500,000 under the same terms as the Sixth Promissory Notes. On December 15, 2021, the maturity date was extended to January 15, 2022 for no consideration. On January 13, 2022, the maturity date was extended to February 15, 2022 for no consideration. On February 15, 2022, the maturity date was extended to April 15, 2022 for no consideration. On March 21, 2022, the Company entered into an amending agreement whereby the Lender agreed to advance an additional $250,000, under the same terms as the Sixth Promissory Notes.

We have not as yet put into commercial production any mineral properties and as such have no operating revenues. Accordingly, we are dependent on debt and equity financing as its primary source of operating working capital. Our capital resources are largely determined by the strength of the junior resource markets and by the status of our projects in relation to these markets, and our ability to compete for investor support of our projects.

We remain dependent on additional financing to fund development requirements on the Helmer-Bovill property and for general corporate costs. With respect to funds required for capital cost items, State-sponsored debt financing instruments may be available on attractive terms, and we intend to pursue such financial instruments to cover portions of the capital costs associated with placing the Bovill Project deposits into production.

We do not have the ability to internally generate sufficient cash flows to support our operations for the next twelve months. We have been receiving funds from a company controlled by a director of the Company through promissory notes. We have no formal plan in place to address this going concern issue but consider that we will be able to obtain additional funds by equity financing and/or debt financing; however, there is no assurance of additional funding being available. As a result, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

During 2020 and 2021, there was an outbreak of COVID-19 that has impacted the economic environment and the capital markets. As the Company is at the stage of exploration and evaluation and is looking to fund mine development leading to production, the impacts of COVID-19 are not determinable at this date. COVID-19 however, could have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operation and cash flows. The Company's liquidity and its ability to continue as a going concern may also be impacted.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to shareholders.



                                       22

Critical Accounting Policies



Measurement Uncertainty


The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long lived assets, stock-based compensation, valuation of convertible debentures and derivative liabilities, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected. The most significant estimates with regard to our condensed consolidated financial statements relate to the determination of fair values of derivative liabilities and stock-based transactions.




Stock-based Compensation


We account for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method. Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable.

We account for the granting of stock options using the fair value method whereby all awards will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all stock options is expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

Compensation costs for stock-based payments that do not include performance conditions are recognized on a straight-line basis. Compensation cost associated with a share based award having a performance condition is recognized on the probable outcome of that performance condition during the requisite service period. Share based awards with a performance condition are accrued on an award by award basis.

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

Mineral Property Acquisition and Exploration Costs

Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized when incurred. Acquisition costs include cash consideration and the fair market value of shares issued on the acquisition of mineral property claims.

Costs related to the development of our mineral reserves are capitalized when it has been determined an ore body can be economically developed. The development stage begins when an ore body is determined to be economically recoverable based on proven and probable reserves and appropriate permits are in place, and ends when the production stage or exploitation of reserves begins. Major mine development expenditures are capitalized, including primary development costs such as costs of building access ways, tailings impoundment, development of water supply and infrastructure developments.

Exploration costs include those relating to activities carried out (a) in search of previously unidentified mineral deposits, or (b) at undeveloped concessions. Pre-development activities involve costs incurred in the exploration stage that may ultimately benefit production that are expensed due to the lack of evidence of economic development, which is necessary to demonstrate future recoverability of these expenses. Secondary development costs are incurred for preparation of an ore body for production in a specific ore block or work area, providing a relatively short-lived benefit only to the mine area they relate to, and not to the ore body as a whole.

Once production has commenced, capitalized costs will be depleted using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to the Consolidated Statements of Loss in that period.



                                       23

We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for impairment whenever information or circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. Such evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, a write down to the estimated fair value is charged to the Consolidated Statements of Loss for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.

For significant exploration and development projects, interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of developing and constructing assets in accordance with ASC 835-20. Interest is capitalized until the asset is ready for service. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying the Company's weighted-average borrowing cost on general debt by the average amount of qualifying costs incurred. Once an asset subject to interest capitalization is completed and placed in service, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depletion or impairment.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses