Marquee Resources Limited release an overview of its Mt Clement Gold-Antimony Project in the northern Capricorn Orogen of Western Australia (exploration license applications E08/3214 and E08/3301). The Mt Clement Project consists of 360 square kilometers of tenure prospective for syngenetic gold-antimony mineralisation, a poorly understood and underexplored mineralization style in the Ashburton Basin. The Mt Clement Project represents a genuine greenfields opportunity in one of Australia's most unexplored regions Following geological review, compilation of available geochemical data and geophysical interpretation, a number of targets have been delineated in analogous lithostructural settings to the adjoining Mt Clement Deposit which is prospective for gold and silver, with appreciable amounts of antimony and lead. Of particular interest to the Company is the gold and antimony exploration potential of the Project. Marquee is currently focusing on the West Spargoville Gold and Nickel Project, and is awaiting the assay results from the Phase 1 drilling campaign that it has now completed. Alongside this ongoing exploration campaign at the West Spargoville Project, the Company is also completing a comprehensive review of its project portfolio and corporate strategy with a view to unlocking and maximising the value of its complete suite of assets. The Mt Clement Project is located km SW of Northern S ar s Pa lsens gold mine, at the western end of the Ashburton Basin in the northern Capricorn Orogen of Western Australia. The Project consists of exploration license applications E08/3214 and E08/3301. The Mt Clement Deposit is situated in the middle of the tenement package and numerous other historical gold and base metal mines and prospects surrounding the tenure. There has been debate over the mineralisation style observed at the Mt Clement deposit, however a recent study suggests Mt Clement is most likely a syngenetic exhalative-style deposit, similar to the Eskay Creek Au-Ag deposit in British Columbia and was deposited broadly coeval with the deposition of the Ashburton Basin (Guilliamse, JN 2020). The genetic model for these deposits involves magmatic-derived fluids venting into a shallow water nvironment, typically sourced from a shallow magmatic body (Massey et al., 1999). They are Au and Ag rich, leave geochemical signatures similar to epithermal deposits (Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Sb, Hg), but also display large sericite pyrite chlorite alteration zones that are typical of VMS deposits. These deposits are transitional between deep water VMS deposits, and subaerial epithermal Au Ag hot spring deposits, and display characteristics of both deposit types (Massey et al., 1999). Eskay Creek was the first deposit of this style to be recognized and has an indicated gold resource, however these types of deposits have since become more widely recognized. Other than orogenic and Carlin-type gold, most deposits in the Ashburton Basin are associated with localized volcanism and intrusion of the Moorarie Supersuite granitic rocks. Granitic plutons at depth are interpreted to have been the driver of mineralisation at the Mt Clement deposit and as such further exploration for syngenetic deposits would be best focused proximal to volcanic centres and plutons. The current understanding of the geology of the Mt Clement Project is simplistic with rock units broadly mapped s the Ashburton Formation. Company acquired, detailed aeromagnetic data over the immediate Mt Clement area, however, highlights complex magnetic signatures and potentially provides insight into mineralising processes occurring in the subsurface. The Mt Clement deposit is associated with discrete magnetic highs within a broader zone of low magnetic signature. The interpretation is that the low-magnetic zones may represent granitic intrusions at depth, a potential fluid source for mineralisation, while the discrete magnetic highs represent hypogene and supergene alteration (forming iron-oxides) of the metasedimentary host rocks. Using the Mt Clement deposit as an analogy, by targeting areas with discrete magnetic highs proximal to broad magnetic lows, the company have identified a number of targets where similar geological and mineralizing processes may have occurred. The coarse, government acquired magnetic surveys over the broader Mt Clement project do not provide the adequate resolution to clearly define the size, amplitude and depth of the observed magnetic responses. As such high resolution aeromagnetics and ground gravity data is required to enhance understanding and refine targeting at the Mt Clement Project.