CORPORATE PRESENTATION
JANUARY 2021
DISCLAIM ER
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this presentation that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the
company's lead product candidate LYR-210, the presentation of top-line results relating to the Company's Phase 2 LANTERN clinical trial for LYR-210 and the Company's plans to initiate a pivotal Phase 3 study for LYR-210 in CRS for both non-polyp and polyp patients. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the company's actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following:
the fact that the company has incurred significant losses since inception and expects to incur losses for the foreseeable future; the company's need for
additional funding, which may not be available; the company's limited operating history; the fact that the company has no approved products; the fact that the company's product candidates are in various stages of development; the fact that the company may not be successful in its efforts to identify and successfully commercialize its product candidates; the fact that clinical trials required for the company's product candidates are expensive and time-consuming, and their outcome is uncertain; the fact that the FDA may not conclude that certain of the company's product candidates satisfy the requirements for the
Section 505(b)(2) regulatory approval pathway; the company's inability to obtain required regulatory approvals; effects of recently enacted and future
legislation; the possibility of system failures or security breaches; effects of significant competition; the fact that the successful commercialization of the company's product candidates will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities and health insurers establish coverage, adequate reimbursement levels and pricing policies; failure to achieve market acceptance; product liability lawsuits; the fact that the company relies on third parties for the manufacture of materials for its research programs, pre-clinical studies and clinical trials; the company's reliance on third parties to conduct its preclinical
studies and clinical trials; the company's inability to succeed in establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships; the company's reliance on certain suppliers critical to its production; failure to obtain and maintain or adequately protect the company's intellectual property rights; failure to retain key personnel or to recruit qualified personnel; difficulties in managing the company's growth; effects of natural disasters; the fact that the global pandemic caused
by COVID-19 could adversely impact the company's business and operations, including the company's clinical trials; the fact that the price of the company's common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially; significant costs and required management time as a result of operating as a public company and any securities class action litigation. These and other important factors discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in the company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020 and its other filings with the SEC could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this presentation. Any such forward-looking statements represent management's estimates as of the date of this presentation. While the company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause its views to change.
2
INVESTM ENT SUM M ARY
Disrupting the treatment paradigm for intranasal drug delivery, starting with CRS
Developing Long-Acting Intranasal Implants for CRS
- Only therapy to achieve a benefit as much as six months after a single treatment
• 14M Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients in U.S.; $6B addressable market
- No FDA approved medicines for non-polyp(70-90% of CRS patients)
Positive LANTERN Phase 2 Results for LYR-210 Announced 4Q 2020
- Rapid, durable, and clinically meaningful symptom improvement
• 100% had clinically meaningful symptom improvement at Week 24 (7500 mcg)
- First implant to demonstrate benefit in both polyps & non-polyps
- Supports pathway to regulatory submission for pivotal trial in 2021
Potential Multiple Expansion Opportunities through XTreoTM Platform
- LANTERN supports XTreo as a tunable, long-acting, local, drug delivery platform
- LYR-220,for CRS patients with prior sinus surgery, expected to enter clinic in 2021
3
LYR A'S PROPRIETA RY
XTREO T M PLATFORM
BIOCOMPATIBLE | ENGINEERED | VERSATILE | ||
MESH | ELASTOMERIC | POLYMER-DRUG | ||
SCAFFOLD | MATRIX | COMPLEX |
4
ENGINEERED ELASTOM ERIC MATRIX
A D A P T S T O N A S A L A N AT O M Y
Shape-memory
- Adaptive elastic tension
- Resists deformation
- Designed to maintain persistent positioning
Designed to be
Self-retaining
- Exerts outward retention force at the target location
- Designed to remain in place as tissue remodels
5
FOCUSED INITIAL DEVELOPM EN T PIPELIN E
LYR-210 and LYR-220: Designed to address the full spectrum of CRS patients
Candidate | Pre-clinical | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Next | ||||
Milestone | |||||||||
Chronic Rhinosinusitis | |||||||||
LYR-210 | LYR-220 | ||||||||
LYR-210 | Surgically Naïve Patients | ||||||||
End of Phase 2 | |||||||||
Long-acting | |||||||||
FDA Meeting | |||||||||
Mometasone | |||||||||
Mid 2021 | |||||||||
Furoate | |||||||||
Chronic Rhinosinusitis | |
LYR-220 | Operated Patients |
Long-acting | Enter Clinic |
Mometasone | End 2021 |
Furoate |
6
WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXPAN SION INDIC ATION S
Lyra's XTreoTM platform has potential applications to other indications where long- term delivery would improve local bioavailability and enhance efficacy or safety
Potential Expansion Indications:
3 | |||||||
1 | Chronic Rhinosinusitis | 3 | Nasal Delivery for | 1 | |||
Allergic Rhinitis | CNS Disorders | 2 | 4 | ||||
2 | Ear Conditions | 4 | Rare Disorders |
7
WHAT IS CHRONIC RHINOSINU SITIS (CRS)?
Chronic Rhinosinusitis: The "Unrecognized Epidemic"1
United States | |||||
~14M CRS Prevalent Patients2 | |||||
CRS Cardinal Symptoms1 | ~8M | CRS Patients Treated by Physicians Annually3 | |||
Nasal obstruction | Nasal discharge | ~4M | CRS Patients Failing Medical | ||
and congestion | Management Annually4 | ||||
Facial pain and | Olfactory loss | ||||
pressure | |||||
1) Tan BK et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013;188(11):1275-7; 2) Battacharrya. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2011; Jul;120(7):423-7; 3) Jang et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018; 4) Baguley et al. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2014;4(7):525-32
8
CHRONIC RHINOSIN U SITIS
Current treatments do not control CRS symptoms in the majority of patients
FIRST-LINE THERAPY | SECOND-LINE THERAPY | |
Surgical Treatments + | ||
Medical Management | ||
Medical Management | ||
65% | 20% | 100% | ||||||||
~50% | of patients fail | have | elect | require | ||||||
medical management1 | recurrent | revision | ongoing | |||||||
CRS2 | surgery3 | medical | ||||||||
management4 | ||||||||||
1) Young et al. Allergy Rhinol, 2012; 3:e8-e12; 2) Schaitkin et al. Laryngoscope, 1993; 103; 3) Stein et al. Laryngoscope,2018; 128(1): 31-36; 4) Rosenfeld et al. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2015; 152(2S)
9
CHRONIC RHINOSIN U SITIS
An unmet need for better treatment options exists for most patients
4M400K
fail medical | get surgery1 |
management | |
Up to 90%
of patients are left with suboptimal treatment options
1) Young, L. Cet al. Allergy & Rhinology, 2012; 3(1), 8-12
10
LY R - 210 & LYR - 220
Designed for the full range of CRS patients treated by an ENT regardless of polyp status
For Surgically Naïve CRS Patients | For Operated CRS Patients |
LYR-210 | ~4M | LYR-220 | ||||||
60% | 40% | |||||||
Mometasone Furoate | Patients | XL | ||||||
Mometasone Furoate | ||||||||
Polyp
11
LY R - 2 1 0
Only product candidate designed to provide 6 months of CRS therapy with a single treatment
FDA-approved API/steroid:
Mometasone furoate
Designed to provide continuous treatment as an alternative to surgery
Administered nasally via a single-use applicator
Office-based procedure with topical anesthesia
Middle
Turbinate
Middle
Meatus
Not detectable by patients
Designed to be replaced every 6 months
12
LAN TER N PH ASE 2 STUDY
Despite COVID-19, we believe LANTERN significantly de-risked the Phase 3 pivotal study
EfficacyPrimaryEndpoint | EndpointsOther |
LYR-210 (2500 μg) |
Safety & Symptom | |||||||||
LYR-210 (7500 μg) | Follow-up Post | ||||||||
Removal | |||||||||
Control* | |||||||||
Week 4 | Week 24 (EOT) | Week 48 (EOS) | |||||||
Removal | Safety | ||||||||
Procedure | Follow up | ||||||||
LANTERN results support selection of dose and timing of the primary symptomatic endpoint for Phase 3
EOT = End of Treatment, EOS = End of Study
*Control = Sham procedure followed by daily saline irrigation
Randomized, Blinded, Controlled, Dose-ranging
Enrollment curtailed at 67 due to COVID-19
- 110 - 150 planned
- 1:1:1 randomization
Evaluated efficacy in adult subjects with CRS who have failed medical management as an alternative to surgery
16 sites in Europe, Australia, New Zealand
13
LY R - 2 1 0
LANTERN
PHASE 2 STUDY
Well-tolerated throughout the
24-week treatment period at both doses
WELL-TOLERATED SAFETY PROFILE AT BOTH DOSES
No treatment-related SAEs
Treatment-related AE's in more than 1 subject:
- Epistaxis: 3 subjects at 2500 mcg
- Rhinitis: 3 subjects at 7500 mcg
- Rhinorrhea: 2 subjects at 2500 mcg
- Headache: 2 subjects in control
All treatment-related AEs mild or moderate apart from one event:
- Increased viscosity of upper respiratory secretion at 2500 mcg
Treatment-related AE's in control and 7500 mcg groups
occurred at comparable rates
14
LAN TER N PH ASE 2 STUDY
Significant benefit observed along regulatory and clinical measures of efficacy
SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
Global instrument widely used by ENTs in practice
Gold standard validated CRS-specific instrument
22 patient reported questions (0-5 scale, total = 110)
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of -8.91
Cardinal Symptom Assessment
Preferred by FDA for regulatory approval in CRS
Sponsor plans to select 2-4 cardinal symptoms:
- Obstruction congestion
- Nasal discharge
- Facial pain/pressure
- Loss of sense of smell
No minimal clinical importance difference (MCID) established
1) Hopkins C et al. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2009, 34, 447-454
15
LY R - 2 1 0 | ||||||||
LANTERN | DOSE DEPENDENT SYMPTOM | |||||||
PHASE 2 STUDY | ||||||||
IMPROVEMENT BY 4CS 1 , 2 | ||||||||
LYR-210 (7500µg) | LYR-210 (2500µg) | Control | ||||||
Rapid symptom improvement | 0.0 | |||||||
that becomes more pronounced | -1.0 | |||||||
over 24 weeks | 4CSin | -2.0 | ||||||
Found 6-month benefit from a single | CFBL | -3.0 | p=0.067 | |||||
administration | -4.0 | |||||||
p=0.086 | p=0.012 | p=0.016 | ||||||
p=0.021 | ||||||||
-5.0 | ||||||||
0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | ||
Showed benefit in both polyp and | Weeks | |||||||
non-polyp patients |
- 4 cardinal symptom score includes nasal obstruction/congestion, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure and anosmia (score of 0-12 based on 7-day average symptom score); 2) Data represents the least square mean. Missing data and data post use of rescue medication was imputed by LOCF method
16
LY R - 2 1 0 | ||||||||
LANTERN | S Y M P TO M I M P R O V E M E N T B Y S N O T - 2 2 1 , 2 | |||||||
PHASE 2 STUDY | TH E C L I N I C AL G O L D S TAN D AR D | |||||||
LYR-210 (7500µg) | LYR-210 (2500µg) | Control | ||||||
0 | ||||||||
Rapid, durable and clinically | ||||||||
meaningful results based on | -10 | |||||||
gold standard measurement | 19 point improvement over control | |||||||
22 | -20 | >2x the MCID of 8.9 points3 | ||||||
SNOTin - | ||||||||
>2X the MCID of 8.9 points relative | -30 | p=0.072 | ||||||
to control | CFBL | -40 | p=0.039 | p=0.076 | p=0.028 | |||
p=0.008 | p=0.001 | |||||||
p=0.001 | ||||||||
70% of patients in the 7500 mcg | -50 | |||||||
0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | ||
group improved ≥ MCID at week | Weeks | |||||||
4; 100% by week 24 |
- SinoNasal Outcome Test is a patient reported score from 0 - 110 based on symptoms; 2) Data represents the least square mean. Missing data and data post use of rescue medication was imputed by LOCF method; 3) Minimal clinically important difference
17
S N O T- 22 SCORE COMPARISON*
LYR-210 performance is highly competitive
Absolute change of ~40 points and clinically meaningful (>8.9 points) difference relative to control for 7500 mcg dose
CFBL IN SNOT-22 at 16 Weeks
LYR-210 | XHANCE | XHANCE | |||
LANTERN | NAVIGATE I | NAVIGATE II | |||
0 | |||||
SNOT-22 | -10 | ||||
-20 | |||||
in | |||||
CFBL | -30 | ||||
-40 | |||||
Difference | Difference | Difference | |||
-50 | -15.0 | -8.6 | -9.7 | ||
1.6x MCID | |||||
TREATMENT | CONTROL |
CFBL IN SNOT-22 at 24 Weeks
LYR-210 | DUPIXENT | XOLAIR | XOLAIR | ||
LANTERN | SINU24 | POLYP 1 | POLYP 2 | ||
0 | |||||
22 | -10 | ||||
SNOT- | -20 | ||||
in | |||||
CFBL | -30 | ||||
-40 | |||||
Difference | Difference | Difference | Difference | ||
-50 | -19.0 | -21.1 | -16.1 | -15.0 | |
2.1x MCID | |||||
TREATMENT CONTROL
*Data from separate trials with different inclusion/ exclusion criteria and patient populations
Sources:
XHANCE: Sindwani, et al., Am J Rhinol Allergy 2019, Vol. 33(1) 69-82; Lepard et al., J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2019;143:126-34
DUPIXENT: Bachert, et al., Lancet 2019; 394: 1638-50
XOLAIR: Gevaert et al, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2020, 146(3), 595-605
18
PATH FORWAR D
Positive Phase 2 results should position Lyra to move forward to pivotal Phase 3 program
Expectations for Phase 3LYR-210 Expected Milestones
Single Phase 3 study with 7500 mcg dose | 2021 |
300 - 350 patients, US-centric
Timing of primary symptomatic endpoint consistent with recent approved products
1 Q | 2 Q | 3 Q | 4 Q | |
• End of Ph2 FDA | • LYR-220 Phase 2 | |||
Meeting | start |
Timing of Symptomatic Endpoints of Products Approved for CRS with Polyps
Merck | Optinose | Intersect ENT | Regeneron/Sanofi | Novartis/Genentech |
Nasonex® | XHANCE® | SINUVA® | DUPIXENT® | XOLAIR® |
2004 | 2017 | 2017 | 2019 | 2020 |
4-Week | 24-Week |
19
COM M ERCIAL: LYR - 210 /2 2 0
Competitive comparison indicates potential advantages
OptiNose | Regeneron/Sanofi | Intersect ENT | LYR-210/220 | ||||
Xhance® | Dupixent® | Sinuva® | |||||
Steroid nasal spray | Monoclonal antibody | Short-term steroid stent | 6-mo continuous |
for uncontrolled disease | for surgical relapse | intranasal | |
(fluticasone, BID) | |||
(anti-IL4, SQ injection) | (mometasone furoate) | steroid therapy | |
Local effect
Requires no patient compliance
For non-polypand polyp CRS
6-month continuous treatment with one application
20
COM M ERCIAL: CURRENT THER APY PRICING
Broad range of price points provides pricing flexibility for LYR-210
Merck | OptiNose | Intersect ENT | Regeneron/Sanofi | Sinus Surgery | |||||
Nasonex® | Xhance® | Sinuva® | Dupixent® | ||||||
Steroid nasal spray | Steroid nasal spray | Short-term steroid stent | Monoclonal antibody | Functional Endoscopic | |||||
for surgical relapse | for uncontrolled disease | ||||||||
(mometasone furoate, BID) | (fluticasone, BID) | Sinus Surgery | |||||||
(mometasone furoate) | (anti-IL4, SQ injection) | ||||||||
ANNUAL | ~$3,000 | ~$6,000 to $11,000 | ~$10,000 | ~$36,000 | Average | ||||
PRICE | ~$14,000 | ||||||||
Source: Product package inserts and IBM Micromedex RED BOOK
21
COM M ERCIAL: LYR - 210 /2 2 0
Potential to fit well into ENT reimbursement models
Professional Fee | Product Fee | ||||
Office procedure | Reimburse via a J-Code | ||||
LYR-210/220 placed with nasal endoscopy | Purchase through buy-and-bill or specialty pharmacy | ||||
Leverage existing CPT codes | 5%-10%mark-up per unit | ||||
for placement and removal | |||||
22
Commercialization
Strategy
Promote product awareness among ENTs and patients
Secure broad payer coverage
Ensure reimbursement confidence and facilitate processing of claims
Limit product acquisition "hassle-factor"
Field Force
(75-100)
Field Based | Market |
Reimbursement | |
Access Team | |
Experts (15 - 20) | |
LYRA | |
COMMERCIALIZATION | |
MODEL |
Reimbursement | Product |
Support Hub | Distribution |
23
INVESTM ENT SUM M ARY
Disrupting the treatment paradigm for intranasal drug delivery, starting with CRS
Developing Long-Acting Intranasal Implants for CRS
- Only therapy to achieve a benefit as much as six months after a single treatment
• 14M Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients in U.S.; $6B addressable market
- No FDA approved medicines for non-polyp(70-90% of CRS patients)
Positive LANTERN Phase 2 Results for LYR-210 Announced 4Q 2020
- Rapid, durable, and clinically meaningful symptom improvement
• 100% had clinically meaningful symptom improvement at Week 24 (7500 mcg)
- First implant to demonstrate benefit in both polyps & non-polyps
- Supports pathway to regulatory submission for pivotal trial in 2021
Potential Multiple Expansion Opportunities through XTreoTM Platform
- LANTERN supports XTreo as a tunable, long-acting, local, drug delivery platform
- LYR-220,for CRS patients with prior sinus surgery, expected to enter clinic in 2021
24
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Lyra Therapeutics Inc. published this content on 15 January 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 15 January 2021 17:33:02 UTC