Central People Government of People Re : China committed to Asia-Pacific economic integration process

China said on Jan 24 that it was committed to the process of Asia-Pacific economic integration in a spirit of openness, inclusivity and transparency, despite the United States quitting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

'China will forge ahead with the negotiation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the construction of the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) so as to add new impetus to regional and global economic development,' said Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying at a daily press briefing.

US President Donald Trump on Jan 23 signed a memorandum ordering withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

The TPP, a free-trade pact between 12 Asia-Pacific countries, was formally signed by ministers last February after more than five years of negotiation. China is not a member of the TPP.

Hua said that China had always called for an open, transparent and mutually beneficial regional free trade arrangement and believed trade rules should be made through negotiation with all parties on an equal footing.

'The Asia Pacific region should continue to exert its role as the engine of global economy under the current economic downturn and establish an open economy,' said Hua.

The RCEP covers 16 countries, including 10 members of the Association of the Southeast Asian Nations and their regional trading partners, China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand and India.

The FTAAP was launched with a road map at the 2014 APEC Summit in Beijing. A collective strategic study was subsequently conducted and the result approved at the APEC meeting in Lima.

By encompassing all 21 APEC economies in trade liberalization, the FTAAP will become the world's largest free trade zone, covering 57 percent of the global economy and nearly half of world trade.

When asked whether China would play the role of leader on the issue, Hua said 'it is more precise to use the word 'responsibility' rather than 'leader.''