Approximately 700 investors are suing Deloitte & Associés and Grant Thornton, accusing them of certifying financial statements deemed misleading for several years prior to the financial collapse and restructuring of the group. The law firm representing their interests filed the lawsuit on Thursday, February 5.
Atos's statutory auditors are facing an unprecedented class action in France. Around 700 individual shareholders, both current and former, have decided to pursue the professional civil liability of Deloitte & Associés and Grant Thornton, the group's statutory auditors between 2017 and 2022, as well as for the 2023 accounts published in early 2024. The case is being brought by the law firm Vermeille & Co, with support from UPRA (Union for the Protection of Shareholders). It is financed by a litigation fund.
The plaintiffs are investors who purchased Atos shares between February 2018 and March 2024, relying on certified accounts that they now consider inaccurate. They argue that the group's financial situation had been deteriorating for a long time, without this reality being clearly disclosed to the market, until the shock of 2024. The annual results revealed €3.4 billion in losses and heavy net debt, which necessitated a major restructuring, resulting in the near-total dilution of historical shareholders.
At the heart of the case, shareholders accuse the auditors of having approved, over six consecutive fiscal years, accounts that did not reflect Atos's economic reality. They point in particular to overvalued assets, overly optimistic revenue recognition, insufficiently provisioned risks, and what they consider a misleading presentation of operational performance. They also believe the auditors failed to warn about the risks to the company's ability to continue as a going concern, which, according to them, had already been compromised since the early 2020s.
AtoS SE is one of the world leaders in IT services. The group's activity is organized around three sectors:
- outsourcing services and consulting services;
- system integration;
- supply of transaction services: electronic payment transaction processing, remote payment management, development of payment solutions, etc. The group also develops an externalization of operating processes activity.
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite), and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Capital Efficiency (Composite), Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.