● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.
● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
● The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
● The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.
● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
● The equity is one of the most attractive in the market with regard to earnings multiple-based valuation.
● The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.
● The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
● Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.
● Over the last 4 months, analysts have significantly revised upwards the company's estimated sales.
● For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
● For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.
● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
Weaknesses
● As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
● The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.
● The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.