Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.

● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.


Strengths

● The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.

● The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.

● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.

● The equity is one of the most attractive in the market with regard to earnings multiple-based valuation.

● The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.

● The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.

● Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Over the last 4 months, analysts have significantly revised upwards the company's estimated sales.

● For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.

● For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.

● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.


Weaknesses

● As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.

● The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.

● The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.